000889160 001__ 889160
000889160 005__ 20230815122842.0
000889160 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.5194/hess-24-4943-2020
000889160 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1027-5606
000889160 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1607-7938
000889160 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/26696
000889160 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:92967560
000889160 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000585918000001
000889160 037__ $$aFZJ-2021-00083
000889160 082__ $$a550
000889160 1001_ $$00000-0003-3870-986X$$aNguyen, Thuy Huu$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000889160 245__ $$aComparison of root water uptake models in simulating CO<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>O fluxes and growth of wheat
000889160 260__ $$aKatlenburg-Lindau$$bEGU$$c2020
000889160 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000889160 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000889160 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1610275440_17468
000889160 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000889160 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000889160 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000889160 520__ $$aStomatal regulation and whole plant hydraulic signaling affect water fluxes and stress in plants. Land surface models and crop models use a coupled photosynthesis–stomatal conductance modeling approach. Those models estimate the effect of soil water stress on stomatal conductance directly from soil water content or soil hydraulic potential without explicit representation of hydraulic signals between the soil and stomata. In order to explicitly represent stomatal regulation by soil water status as a function of the hydraulic signal and its relation to the whole plant hydraulic conductance, we coupled the crop model LINTULCC2 and the root growth model SLIMROOT with Couvreur's root water uptake model (RWU) and the HILLFLOW soil water balance model. Since plant hydraulic conductance depends on the plant development, this model coupling represents a two-way coupling between growth and plant hydraulics. To evaluate the advantage of considering plant hydraulic conductance and hydraulic signaling, we compared the performance of this newly coupled model with another commonly used approach that relates root water uptake and plant stress directly to the root zone water hydraulic potential (HILLFLOW with Feddes' RWU model). Simulations were compared with gas flux measurements and crop growth data from a wheat crop grown under three water supply regimes (sheltered, rainfed, and irrigated) and two soil types (stony and silty) in western Germany in 2016. The two models showed a relatively similar performance in the simulation of dry matter, leaf area index (LAI), root growth, RWU, gross assimilation rate, and soil water content. The Feddes model predicts more stress and less growth in the silty soil than in the stony soil, which is opposite to the observed growth. The Couvreur model better represents the difference in growth between the two soils and the different treatments. The newly coupled model (HILLFLOW–Couvreur's RWU–SLIMROOT–LINTULCC2) was also able to simulate the dynamics and magnitude of whole plant hydraulic conductance over the growing season. This demonstrates the importance of two-way feedbacks between growth and root water uptake for predicting the crop response to different soil water conditions in different soils. Our results suggest that a better representation of the effects of soil characteristics on root growth is needed for reliable estimations of root hydraulic conductance and gas fluxes, particularly in heterogeneous fields. The newly coupled soil–plant model marks a promising approach but requires further testing for other scenarios regarding crops, soil, and climate.
000889160 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000889160 536__ $$0G:(GEPRIS)15232683$$aDFG project 15232683 - TRR 32: Muster und Strukturen in Boden-Pflanzen-Atmosphären-Systemen: Erfassung, Modellierung und Datenassimilation $$c15232683$$x1
000889160 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000889160 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLangensiepen, Matthias$$b1
000889160 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129548$$aVanderborght, Jan$$b2
000889160 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHüging, Hubert$$b3
000889160 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129501$$aMboh, Cho Miltin$$b4
000889160 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aEwert, Frank$$b5
000889160 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2100610-6$$a10.5194/hess-24-4943-2020$$gVol. 24, no. 10, p. 4943 - 4969$$n10$$p4943 - 4969$$tHydrology and earth system sciences$$v24$$x1607-7938$$y2020
000889160 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/889160/files/hess-24-4943-2020.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000889160 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:889160$$pdnbdelivery$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pdriver$$popen_access$$popenaire
000889160 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129548$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000889160 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000889160 9141_ $$y2020
000889160 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2020-08-27
000889160 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2020-08-27
000889160 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000889160 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bHYDROL EARTH SYST SC : 2018$$d2020-08-27
000889160 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2020-08-27
000889160 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2020-08-27
000889160 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2020-08-27
000889160 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2020-08-27
000889160 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2020-08-27
000889160 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2020-08-27
000889160 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000889160 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Peer review$$d2020-08-27
000889160 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2020-08-27
000889160 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences$$d2020-08-27
000889160 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2020-08-27
000889160 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2020-08-27
000889160 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000889160 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000889160 980__ $$ajournal
000889160 980__ $$aVDB
000889160 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000889160 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118