001     889165
005     20240712100828.0
024 7 _ |a 10.5194/acp-20-8989-2020
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1680-7316
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1680-7324
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/26750
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:86726917
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a WOS:000557791000004
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2021-00088
082 _ _ |a 550
100 1 _ |a Wright, Jonathon S.
|0 0000-0001-6551-7017
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Differences in tropical high clouds among reanalyses: origins and radiative impacts
260 _ _ |a Katlenburg-Lindau
|c 2020
|b EGU
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1610475553_22697
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a We examine differences among reanalysis high-cloud products in the tropics, assess the impacts of these differences on radiation budgets at the top of the atmosphere and within the tropical upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS), and discuss their possible origins in the context of the reanalysis models. We focus on the ERA5 (fifth-generation European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts – ECMWF – reanalysis), ERA-Interim (ECMWF Interim Reanalysis), JRA-55 (Japanese 55-year Reanalysis), MERRA-2 (Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2), and CFSR/CFSv2 (Climate Forecast System Reanalysis/Climate Forecast System Version 2) reanalyses. As a general rule, JRA-55 produces the smallest tropical high-cloud fractions and cloud water contents among the reanalyses, while MERRA-2 produces the largest. Accordingly, long-wave cloud radiative effects are relatively weak in JRA-55 and relatively strong in MERRA-2. Only MERRA-2 and ERA5 among the reanalyses produce tropical-mean values of outgoing long-wave radiation (OLR) close to those observed, but ERA5 tends to underestimate cloud effects, while MERRA-2 tends to overestimate variability. ERA5 also produces distributions of long-wave, short-wave, and total cloud radiative effects at the top of the atmosphere that are very consistent with those observed. The other reanalyses all exhibit substantial biases in at least one of these metrics, although compensation between the long-wave and short-wave effects helps to constrain biases in the total cloud radiative effect for most reanalyses. The vertical distribution of cloud water content emerges as a key difference between ERA-Interim and other reanalyses. Whereas ERA-Interim shows a monotonic decrease of cloud water content with increasing height, the other reanalyses all produce distinct anvil layers. The latter is in better agreement with observations and yields very different profiles of radiative heating in the UTLS. For example, whereas the altitude of the level of zero net radiative heating tends to be lower in convective regions than in the rest of the tropics in ERA-Interim, the opposite is true for the other four reanalyses. Differences in cloud water content also help to explain systematic differences in radiative heating in the tropical lower stratosphere among the reanalyses. We discuss several ways in which aspects of the cloud and convection schemes impact the tropical environment. Discrepancies in the vertical profiles of temperature and specific humidity in convective regions are particularly noteworthy, as these variables are directly constrained by data assimilation, are widely used, and feed back to convective behaviour through their relationships with thermodynamic stability.
536 _ _ |a 244 - Composition and dynamics of the upper troposphere and middle atmosphere (POF3-244)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-244
|c POF3-244
|x 0
|f POF III
536 _ _ |a DFG project 392169209 - Klimavariabilität in der oberen Troposphäre und Stratosphäre über Asien und ihre Darstellung in modernen Re-Analysen
|0 G:(GEPRIS)392169209
|c 392169209
|x 1
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Sun, Xiaoyi
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Konopka, Paul
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129130
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Krüger, Kirstin
|0 0000-0002-0636-9488
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Legras, Bernard
|0 0000-0002-3756-7794
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Molod, Andrea M.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Tegtmeier, Susann
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Zhang, Guang J.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Zhao, Xin
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)173746
|b 8
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.5194/acp-20-8989-2020
|g Vol. 20, no. 14, p. 8989 - 9030
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2069847-1
|n 14
|p 8989 - 9030
|t Atmospheric chemistry and physics
|v 20
|y 2020
|x 1680-7324
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/889165/files/Wright_2020_acp.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:889165
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
|p VDB
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129130
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)173746
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Erde und Umwelt
|l Atmosphäre und Klima
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-240
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-244
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Composition and dynamics of the upper troposphere and middle atmosphere
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b ATMOS CHEM PHYS : 2018
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b ATMOS CHEM PHYS : 2018
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Peer review
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2020-09-03
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013
|k IEK-7
|l Stratosphäre
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-4-20101013


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21