% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Schneider:889213,
      author       = {Schneider, Jana and Groh, Jannis and Pütz, Thomas and
                      Helmig, Rainer and Rothfuss, Youri and Vereecken, Harry and
                      Vanderborght, Jan},
      title        = {{P}rediction of soil evaporation measured with weighable
                      lysimeters using the {FAO} {P}enman–{M}onteith method in
                      combination with {R}ichards’ equation},
      journal      = {Vadose zone journal},
      volume       = {20},
      number       = {1},
      issn         = {1539-1663},
      address      = {Hoboken, NJ},
      publisher    = {Wiley},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2021-00119},
      pages        = {e20102},
      year         = {2021},
      abstract     = {Multiannual data (2016–2018) from 12 weighed lysimeters
                      (four soil types with textures ranging from sandy loam to
                      silt loam, three replicates) of the TERENO SOILCan network
                      were used to evaluate if evaporation (E) rates could be
                      predicted from weather data using the FAO Penman–Monteith
                      (PM) method combined with soil water flow simulations using
                      the Richards equation. Soil hydraulic properties (SHPs) were
                      estimated either from soil texture using the ROSETTA
                      pedotransfer functions, from in situ measured water
                      retention curves, or from soil surface water contents using
                      inverse modeling. In all years, E was water limited and the
                      measured evaporation rates (Em) surprisingly did not vary
                      significantly among the four different soil types. When SHPs
                      derived from pedotransfer functions were used, simulated
                      evaporation rates of the finer textured soils overestimated
                      the measured ones considerably. Better agreement was
                      obtained when simulations were based on in situ measured or
                      inversely estimated SHPs. The SHPs estimated from
                      pedotransfer functions represented unrealistically large
                      characteristic lengths of evaporation (Lc), and Lc was found
                      to be a useful characteristic to constrain estimates of
                      SHPs. Also, when soil evaporation was water limited and Em
                      rates were below Epot (PM evaporation scaled by an empirical
                      coefficient), the diurnal dynamics of Em followed those of
                      Epot. The Richards equation that considers only isothermal
                      liquid water flow did not reproduce these dynamics caused by
                      temperature dependent vapor transport in the soil.},
      cin          = {IBG-3},
      ddc          = {550},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
      pnm          = {217 - Für eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von
                      Ressourcen zu Produkten (POF4-217)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000620855500007},
      doi          = {10.1002/vzj2.20102},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/889213},
}