000889244 001__ 889244
000889244 005__ 20210623133429.0
000889244 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.108124
000889244 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0038-0717
000889244 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1879-3428
000889244 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/27682
000889244 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:97483490
000889244 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000626605100006
000889244 037__ $$aFZJ-2021-00149
000889244 082__ $$a540
000889244 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchimmel, Heike$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000889244 245__ $$aCarbon stability in a Scottish lowland raised bog: Potential legacy effects of historical land use and implications for global change
000889244 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2021
000889244 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000889244 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000889244 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1619196169_2072
000889244 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000889244 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000889244 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000889244 520__ $$aPeatlands comprise major global stocks of soil organic carbon (SOC). Many degraded peatlands are currently being restored, but little is known to which degree former disturbances leave a ‘legacy’ in such restored peatlands, and subsequently how this impacts their response to global change. Our aims were to investigate if after 20 years of restoration (i) carbon stability may still be affected by the former land use and if (ii) restored bogs are less susceptible to nutrient input but (iii) more sensitive to temperature rise. We sampled the top- and subsoil of a formerly drained, a previously drained and afforested part and an unmanaged control site of a Scottish bog. We incubated peat from each part for determination of potential basal respiration, nutrient limitation and temperature sensitivity (Q10) of aerobic peat degradation. Lowest respiration rates were identified at the afforested site while nutrient addition had no significant effect on topsoil organic matter decomposition at all sites. Q10 values were significantly higher in the topsoil (2.6 ± 0.3 to 2.8 ± 0.2) than in the subsoil. For the subsoil, the drained site (2.0 ± 0.0) showed significantly lower Q10 values than the afforested one (2.6 ± 0.6), while the control site had a Q10 of 2.1 ± 0.0, indicating contrasting temperature sensitivities of potential SOC losses following specific forms of disturbance. Overall, our data indicate that afforestation left a legacy on potential subsoil SOC losses with global warming. Such effects must be considered when integrating restored bogs into global data bases on peatlands' responses to global change.
000889244 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217$$a217 - Für eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten (POF4-217)$$cPOF4-217$$fPOF IV$$x0
000889244 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000889244 7001_ $$00000-0002-1085-4478$$aBraun, Melanie$$b1
000889244 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSubke, Jens-Arne$$b2
000889244 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129427$$aAmelung, Wulf$$b3
000889244 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145865$$aBol, Roland$$b4
000889244 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1498740-5$$a10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.108124$$gp. 108124 -$$p108124$$tSoil biology & biochemistry$$v154$$x0038-0717$$y2021
000889244 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/889244/files/Manuscript%20final.pdf$$yPublished on 2021-01-05. Available in OpenAccess from 2023-01-05.
000889244 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:889244$$pdnbdelivery$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pdriver$$popen_access$$popenaire
000889244 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129427$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000889244 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)145865$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
000889244 9130_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000889244 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt$$lErde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten$$vFür eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten$$x0
000889244 9141_ $$y2021
000889244 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2020-09-03
000889244 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2020-09-03
000889244 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2020-09-03
000889244 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2020-09-03
000889244 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2020-09-03
000889244 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1040$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bZoological Record$$d2020-09-03
000889244 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0530$$2StatID$$aEmbargoed OpenAccess
000889244 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences$$d2020-09-03
000889244 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
000889244 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9905$$2StatID$$aIF >= 5$$bSOIL BIOL BIOCHEM : 2018$$d2020-09-03
000889244 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2020-09-03
000889244 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2020-09-03
000889244 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bSOIL BIOL BIOCHEM : 2018$$d2020-09-03
000889244 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2020-09-03
000889244 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2020-09-03
000889244 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2020-09-03$$wger
000889244 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2020-09-03
000889244 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000889244 980__ $$ajournal
000889244 980__ $$aVDB
000889244 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000889244 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000889244 9801_ $$aFullTexts