% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Schimmel:889244,
      author       = {Schimmel, Heike and Braun, Melanie and Subke, Jens-Arne and
                      Amelung, Wulf and Bol, Roland},
      title        = {{C}arbon stability in a {S}cottish lowland raised bog:
                      {P}otential legacy effects of historical land use and
                      implications for global change},
      journal      = {Soil biology $\&$ biochemistry},
      volume       = {154},
      issn         = {0038-0717},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2021-00149},
      pages        = {108124},
      year         = {2021},
      abstract     = {Peatlands comprise major global stocks of soil organic
                      carbon (SOC). Many degraded peatlands are currently being
                      restored, but little is known to which degree former
                      disturbances leave a ‘legacy’ in such restored
                      peatlands, and subsequently how this impacts their response
                      to global change. Our aims were to investigate if after 20
                      years of restoration (i) carbon stability may still be
                      affected by the former land use and if (ii) restored bogs
                      are less susceptible to nutrient input but (iii) more
                      sensitive to temperature rise. We sampled the top- and
                      subsoil of a formerly drained, a previously drained and
                      afforested part and an unmanaged control site of a Scottish
                      bog. We incubated peat from each part for determination of
                      potential basal respiration, nutrient limitation and
                      temperature sensitivity (Q10) of aerobic peat degradation.
                      Lowest respiration rates were identified at the afforested
                      site while nutrient addition had no significant effect on
                      topsoil organic matter decomposition at all sites. Q10
                      values were significantly higher in the topsoil (2.6 ± 0.3
                      to 2.8 ± 0.2) than in the subsoil. For the subsoil, the
                      drained site (2.0 ± 0.0) showed significantly lower Q10
                      values than the afforested one (2.6 ± 0.6), while the
                      control site had a Q10 of 2.1 ± 0.0, indicating contrasting
                      temperature sensitivities of potential SOC losses following
                      specific forms of disturbance. Overall, our data indicate
                      that afforestation left a legacy on potential subsoil SOC
                      losses with global warming. Such effects must be considered
                      when integrating restored bogs into global data bases on
                      peatlands' responses to global change.},
      cin          = {IBG-3},
      ddc          = {540},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
      pnm          = {217 - Für eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von
                      Ressourcen zu Produkten (POF4-217)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000626605100006},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.108124},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/889244},
}