Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Carbon stability in a Scottish lowland raised bog: Potential legacy effects of historical land use and implications for global change > print

001     889244
005     20210623133429.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.108124
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0038-0717
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1879-3428
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/27682
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:97483490
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a WOS:000626605100006
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2021-00149
082 _ _ |a 540
100 1 _ |a Schimmel, Heike
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Carbon stability in a Scottish lowland raised bog: Potential legacy effects of historical land use and implications for global change
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2021
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1619196169_2072
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Peatlands comprise major global stocks of soil organic carbon (SOC). Many degraded peatlands are currently being restored, but little is known to which degree former disturbances leave a ‘legacy’ in such restored peatlands, and subsequently how this impacts their response to global change. Our aims were to investigate if after 20 years of restoration (i) carbon stability may still be affected by the former land use and if (ii) restored bogs are less susceptible to nutrient input but (iii) more sensitive to temperature rise. We sampled the top- and subsoil of a formerly drained, a previously drained and afforested part and an unmanaged control site of a Scottish bog. We incubated peat from each part for determination of potential basal respiration, nutrient limitation and temperature sensitivity (Q10) of aerobic peat degradation. Lowest respiration rates were identified at the afforested site while nutrient addition had no significant effect on topsoil organic matter decomposition at all sites. Q10 values were significantly higher in the topsoil (2.6 ± 0.3 to 2.8 ± 0.2) than in the subsoil. For the subsoil, the drained site (2.0 ± 0.0) showed significantly lower Q10 values than the afforested one (2.6 ± 0.6), while the control site had a Q10 of 2.1 ± 0.0, indicating contrasting temperature sensitivities of potential SOC losses following specific forms of disturbance. Overall, our data indicate that afforestation left a legacy on potential subsoil SOC losses with global warming. Such effects must be considered when integrating restored bogs into global data bases on peatlands' responses to global change.
536 _ _ |a 217 - Für eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten (POF4-217)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217
|c POF4-217
|x 0
|f POF IV
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Braun, Melanie
|0 0000-0002-1085-4478
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Subke, Jens-Arne
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Amelung, Wulf
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129427
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Bol, Roland
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)145865
|b 4
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.108124
|g p. 108124 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1498740-5
|p 108124
|t Soil biology & biochemistry
|v 154
|y 2021
|x 0038-0717
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/889244/files/Manuscript%20final.pdf
|y Published on 2021-01-05. Available in OpenAccess from 2023-01-05.
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:889244
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
|p VDB
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129427
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)145865
913 0 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Erde und Umwelt
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt
|l Erde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Für eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1040
|2 StatID
|b Zoological Record
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a Embargoed OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0530
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM : 2018
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM : 2018
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2020-09-03
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2020-09-03
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 1 _ |a FullTexts

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21