% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Meissner:889260,
author = {Meissner, Ulf-G.},
title = {{P}recision {P}redictions},
journal = {Nuclear physics news},
volume = {30},
number = {2},
issn = {1931-7336},
address = {London [u.a.]},
publisher = {Taylor $\&$ Francis},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-00165},
pages = {17 - 20},
year = {2020},
abstract = {First, I should define what is meant by a precision
prediction: A prediction is considered precise if it has a
small (relative) theoretical uncertainty. This, however,
does not imply that it agrees with an experiment. Also, the
mentioned small uncertainty can be best quantified if we
have an underlying counting rule based on some small
parameter. Needless to say, a prediction without uncertainty
makes little sense. Finally, in what follows I will mostly
consider the interplay of precision predictions with the
corresponding precise experiments.},
cin = {IAS-4 / IKP-3 / JARA-HPC},
ddc = {530},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-4-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)IKP-3-20111104 /
$I:(DE-82)080012_20140620$},
pnm = {511 - Computational Science and Mathematical Methods
(POF3-511) / DFG project 196253076 - TRR 110: Symmetrien und
Strukturbildung in der Quantenchromodynamik (196253076) /
Nuclear Lattice Simulations $(jara0015_20200501)$},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511 / G:(GEPRIS)196253076 /
$G:(DE-Juel1)jara0015_20200501$},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
doi = {10.1080/10619127.2020.1752092},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/889260},
}