% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Buchheit:889278,
author = {Buchheit, Annika and Hoffmeyer, Marija and Teßmer, Britta
and Neuhaus, Kerstin},
title = {{C}haracterization of the {P}article-{P}olymer {I}nterface
in {D}ual-{P}hase {E}lectrolytes by {K}elvin {P}robe {F}orce
{M}icroscopy},
journal = {Journal of the Electrochemical Society},
volume = {168},
number = {1},
issn = {1945-7111},
address = {Bristol},
publisher = {IOP Publishing},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-00183},
pages = {010531},
year = {2021},
abstract = {In this study, the possibility to characterize the
electrochemical characteristics of the particle-polymer
interface in dual-phase electrolytes by measuring the
contact potential difference with high local resolution is
demonstrated. Two different polymer electrolytes,
polyethylene oxide (PEO) and
poly[bis-2-(2-methoxyethoxy)-ethoxyphosphazene] (MEEP), were
investigated in combination with lithium ion conductive
Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZ) particles and two different mixed
ionic-electronic conductive ceramic particles: uncoated and
carbon coated LiFePO4 (LFP) as typical cathode material and
uncoated Li4Ti5O12 as typical anode material. A distinct
Volta potential gradient between the particles and the
polymer was observable in all cases, except when no lithium
salt was present within the polymer matrix. The measured
potential gradients can be explained in terms of a contact
potential between the polymer electrolyte and the ceramic
electrolyte. A more negatively charged space charge layer
around LFP particles in PEO matrix and around LLZ particles
in MEEP can be explained by enrichment of salt anions in
direct vicinity of the particle.Electrochemical
characterization with impedance spectroscopy showed an
increased conductivity for addition of LFP for PEO while the
addition of various particles in different concentrations
showed no effect on the conductivity of MEEP. The lithium
transference number was unaffected by particle addition for
all samples.},
cin = {IEK-12},
ddc = {660},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-12-20141217},
pnm = {131 - Electrochemical Storage (POF3-131) / 1221 -
Fundamentals and Materials (POF4-122)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-131 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1221},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000612842100001},
doi = {10.1149/1945-7111/abda59},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/889278},
}