000889375 001__ 889375
000889375 005__ 20240712100856.0
000889375 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.5194/acp-2020-581
000889375 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/26787
000889375 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:84530416
000889375 037__ $$aFZJ-2021-00258
000889375 082__ $$a550
000889375 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLee, K.-O.$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000889375 245__ $$aConvective uplift of pullution from the Sichuan basin into the Asian monsoon anticyclone during the StratoClim aircraft campaign
000889375 260__ $$aKatlenburg-Lindau$$bEGU$$c2020
000889375 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000889375 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000889375 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1611418814_7122
000889375 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000889375 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000889375 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000889375 520__ $$aThe StratoClim airborne campaign took place in Nepal from 27 July to 10 August 2017 to document the physical and chemical properties of the South Asian Upper Troposphere Lower Stratosphere (UTLS) during the Asian Summer Monsoon (ASM). In the present paper, simulations with the Meso-NH cloud-chemistry model at a horizontal resolution of 15 km are performed over the Asian region to characterize the impact of monsoon deep convection on the composition of Asian Monsoon Anticyclone (AMA) and on the formation of the Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer (ATAL) during the StratoClim campaign. StratoClim took place during a break phase of the monsoon with an intense convective activity over south China and Sichuan. Comparisons between Brightness Temperature (BT) at 10.8 microns observed by satellite sensors and simulated by Meso-NH highlight the ability of the model to correctly reproduce the life cycle of deep convective clouds. Comparison between CO and O3 concentrations from Meso-NH and airborne observations (StratoClim and IAGOS) demonstrates that the model captures most of the observed variabilities. Nevertheless, for both gases, the model tends to overestimate the concentrations and misses some thin CO plumes related to local convective events probably because of a too coarse resolution, but the convective uplift of pollution is very well captured by the model. We have therefore focused on the impact of Sichuan convection on the AMA composition. A dedicated sensitivity simulation showed that the 7 August convective event brought large amounts of CO deep into the AMA and even across the 380 K isentropic level located at 17.8 km. This Sichuan contribution enhanced the CO concentration by ~ 15 % to reach more than 180 ppbv over a large area around 15 km height. Noteworthy, Meso-NH captures the impact of the diluted Sichuan plume on the CO concentration during a StratoClim flight south of Kathmandu highlighting its ability to reproduce the transport pathway of Sichuan pollution. According to the model, primary organic aerosol and black carbon particles originating from Sichuan are transported following the same pathway as CO. The large particles are heavily scavenged within the precipitating part of the convective clouds but remain the most important contributor to the particle mass in the AMA. Over the whole AMA region, the 7 August convective event resulted in a 0.5 % increase of CO over the 10–20 km range that lasted about 2 days. The impact of pollution uplift from three regions (India, China and Sichuan) averaged over the first 10 days of August has also been evaluated with sensitivity simulations. Even during this monsoon break phase, the results confirm the predominant role of India relative to China with respective contributions of 11 and 7 % to CO in the 10–15 km layer. Moreover, during this period a large part (35 %) of the Chinese contribution comes from the Sichuan basin alone.
000889375 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-244$$a244 - Composition and dynamics of the upper troposphere and middle atmosphere (POF3-244)$$cPOF3-244$$fPOF III$$x0
000889375 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBarret, B.$$b1
000889375 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aFlochmoen, E. L.$$b2
000889375 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aTulet, P.$$b3
000889375 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBucci, S.$$b4
000889375 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129170$$avon Hobe, Marc$$b5$$ufzj
000889375 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)161426$$aKloss, Corinna$$b6
000889375 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLegras, B.$$b7
000889375 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLeriche, M.$$b8
000889375 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSauvage, B.$$b9
000889375 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRavegnani, F.$$b10
000889375 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aUlanovsky, A.$$b11
000889375 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2069857-4$$a10.5194/acp-2020-581$$p581$$tAtmospheric chemistry and physics / Discussions$$v2020$$x1680-7367$$y2020
000889375 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/889375/files/acp-2020-581.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000889375 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:889375$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000889375 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129170$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b5$$kFZJ
000889375 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-244$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-240$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lAtmosphäre und Klima$$vComposition and dynamics of the upper troposphere and middle atmosphere$$x0
000889375 9141_ $$y2020
000889375 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000889375 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2020-09-08
000889375 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000889375 920__ $$lyes
000889375 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)VDB790$$kICG-1$$lStratosphäre$$x0
000889375 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013$$kIEK-7$$lStratosphäre$$x1
000889375 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000889375 980__ $$ajournal
000889375 980__ $$aVDB
000889375 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)VDB790
000889375 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013
000889375 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000889375 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-4-20101013