% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Lennartz:889377,
      author       = {Lennartz, S. T. and Gauss, M. and von Hobe, Marc and
                      Marandino, C. A.},
      title        = {{M}onthly resolved modelled oceanic emissions of carbonyl
                      sulfide for the period 2000-2019},
      journal      = {Earth system science data discussions},
      volume       = {2020},
      issn         = {1866-3591},
      address      = {Bremerhaven},
      publisher    = {Copernics Publication},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2021-00260},
      pages        = {389},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {Carbonyl sulfide (OCS) is the most abundant, long-lived
                      sulphur gas in the atmosphere and a major supplier of sulfur
                      to the stratospheric sulfate aerosol layer. The short-lived
                      gas carbon disulfide (CS2) is oxidized to OCS and
                      constitutes a major indirect source to the atmospheric OCS
                      budget. The atmospheric budget of OCS is not well
                      constrained due to a large missing source needed to
                      compensate for substantial evidence that was provided for
                      significantly higher sinks. Oceanic emissions are associated
                      with major uncertainties. Here we provide a first, monthly
                      resolved ocean emission inventory of both gases for the
                      period 2000–2019 (available at
                      https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4297010) (Lennartz et al.,
                      2020a). Emissions are calculated with a numerical box model
                      (resolution 2.8° × 2.8° at equator, T42 grid) for the
                      surface mixed layer. We find that interannual variability in
                      OCS emissions is smaller than seasonal variability, and is
                      mainly driven by variations in chromophoric dissolved
                      organic matter (CDOM), which influences both photochemical
                      and light-independent production. A comparison with a global
                      database of more than 2500 measurements reveals overall good
                      agreement. Emissions of CS2 constitute a larger sulfur
                      source to the atmosphere than OCS, and equally show
                      interannual variability connected to variability of CDOM.
                      The emission estimate of CS2 is associated with higher
                      uncertainties, as process understanding of the marine
                      cycling of CS2 is incomplete. We encourage the use of the
                      data provided here as input for atmospheric modelling
                      studies to further assess the atmospheric OCS budget and the
                      role of OCS in climate.},
      cin          = {IEK-7},
      ddc          = {550},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013},
      pnm          = {244 - Composition and dynamics of the upper troposphere and
                      middle atmosphere (POF3-244)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-244},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      doi          = {10.5194/essd-2020-389},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/889377},
}