001     889648
005     20230111074315.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2020.02.003
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1347-4421
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1389-1723
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/30463
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a 32143998
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000614233200012
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2021-00280
082 _ _ |a 660
100 1 _ |a Lamm, Robin
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Detailed small-scale characterization and scale-up of active YFP inclusion body production with Escherichia coli induced by a tetrameric coiled coil domain
260 _ _ |a [S.l.]
|c 2020
|b Science Direct
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1642785714_3620
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a During heterologous protein production with Escherichia coli, the formation of inclusion bodies (IBs) is often a major drawback as these aggregated proteins are usually inactive. However, different strategies for the generation of IBs consisting of catalytically active proteins have recently been described. In this study, the archaeal tetrameric coiled-coil domain of the cell-surface protein tetrabrachion was fused to a target reporter protein to produce fluorescent IBs (FIBs). As the cultivation conditions severely influence IB formation, the entire cultivation process resulting in the production of FIBs were thoroughly studied. First, the cultivation process was scaled down based on the maximum oxygen transfer capacity, combining online monitoring technologies for shake flasks and microtiter plates with offline sampling. The evaluation of culture conditions in complex terrific broth autoinduction medium showed strong oxygen limitation and leaky expression. Furthermore, strong acetate formation and pH changes from 6.5 to 8.8 led to sub-optimal cultivation conditions. However, in minimal Wilms-MOPS autoinduction medium, defined culture conditions and a tightly controlled expression were achieved. The production of FIBs is strongly influenced by the induction strength. Increasing induction strengths result in lower total amounts of functional protein. However, the amount of functional FIBs increases. Furthermore, to prevent the formation of conventional inactive IBs, a temperature shift from 37 °C to 15 °C is crucial to generate FIBs. Finally, the gained insights were transferred to a stirred tank reactor batch fermentation. Hereby, 12 g/L FIBs were produced, making up 43 % (w/w) of the total generated biomass.
536 _ _ |a 581 - Biotechnology (POF3-581)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-581
|c POF3-581
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Jäger, Vera D.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)166350
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Heyman, Benedikt
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Berg, Christoph
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Cürten, Christin
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Krauss, Ulrich
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131482
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Jaeger, Karl-Erich
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131457
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Büchs, Jochen
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2020.02.003
|g Vol. 129, no. 6, p. 730 - 740
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2016440-3
|n 6
|p 730 - 740
|t Journal of bioscience and bioengineering
|v 129
|y 2020
|x 1389-1723
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/889648/files/20200109-manuscript_production%20of%20active%20inclusion%20bodies_revised%20%28003%29.pdf
|y Published on 2020-03-03. Available in OpenAccess from 2021-03-03.
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:889648
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131482
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131457
910 1 _ |a RWTH Aachen
|0 I:(DE-588b)36225-6
|k RWTH
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
913 0 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Key Technologies for the Bioeconomy
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-581
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Biotechnology
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a Embargoed OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0530
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J BIOSCI BIOENG : 2018
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2020-08-21
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2020-08-21
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IMET-20090612
|k IMET
|l Institut für Molekulare Enzymtechnologie (HHUD)
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)VDB55
|k IBT-1
|l Biotechnologie 1
|x 1
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IMET-20090612
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)VDB55
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21