% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Schlembach:889748,
author = {Schlembach, Ivan and Hosseinpour Tehrani, Hamed and Blank,
Lars M. and Büchs, Jochen and Wierckx, Nick and Regestein,
Lars and Rosenbaum, Miriam A.},
title = {{C}onsolidated bioprocessing of cellulose to itaconic acid
by a co-culture of {T}richoderma reesei and {U}stilago
maydis},
journal = {Biotechnology for biofuels},
volume = {13},
number = {1},
issn = {1754-6834},
address = {London},
publisher = {BioMed Central},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-00362},
pages = {207},
year = {2020},
note = {Biotechnologie 1},
abstract = {BackgroundItaconic acid is a bio-derived platform chemical
with uses ranging from polymer synthesis to biofuel
production. The efficient conversion of cellulosic waste
streams into itaconic acid could thus enable the sustainable
production of a variety of substitutes for fossil oil based
products. However, the realization of such a process is
currently hindered by an expensive conversion of cellulose
into fermentable sugars. Here, we present the stepwise
development of a fully consolidated bioprocess (CBP), which
is capable of directly converting recalcitrant cellulose
into itaconic acid without the need for separate cellulose
hydrolysis including the application of commercial
cellulases. The process is based on a synthetic microbial
consortium of the cellulase producer Trichoderma reesei and
the itaconic acid producing yeast Ustilago maydis. A method
for process monitoring was developed to estimate cellulose
consumption, itaconic acid formation as well as the actual
itaconic acid production yield online during
co-cultivation.ResultsThe efficiency of the process was
compared to a simultaneous saccharification and fermentation
setup (SSF). Because of the additional substrate consumption
of T. reesei in the CBP, the itaconic acid yield was
significantly lower in the CBP than in the SSF. In order to
increase yield and productivity of itaconic acid in the CBP,
the population dynamics was manipulated by varying the
inoculation delay between T. reesei and U. maydis.
Surprisingly, neither inoculation delay nor inoculation
density significantly affected the population development or
the CBP performance. Instead, the substrate availability was
the most important parameter. U. maydis was only able to
grow and to produce itaconic acid when the cellulose
concentration and thus, the sugar supply rate, was high.
Finally, the metabolic processes during fed-batch CBP were
analyzed in depth by online respiration measurements.
Thereby, substrate availability was again identified as key
factor also controlling itaconic acid yield. In summary, an
itaconic acid titer of 34 g/L with a total productivity of
up to 0.07 g/L/h and a yield of 0.16 g/g could be reached
during fed-batch cultivation.ConclusionThis study
demonstrates the feasibility of consortium-based CBP for
itaconic acid production and also lays the fundamentals for
the development and improvement of similar microbial
consortia for cellulose-based organic acid production.},
cin = {IBG-1},
ddc = {660},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-1-20101118},
pnm = {581 - Biotechnology (POF3-581)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-581},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {33317635},
UT = {WOS:000599799200001},
doi = {10.1186/s13068-020-01835-4},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/889748},
}