% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Vmel:889802,
author = {Vömel, Holger and Smit, Herman G. J. and Tarasick, David
and Johnson, Bryan and Oltmans, Samuel J. and Selkirk, Henry
and Thompson, Anne M. and Stauffer, Ryan M. and Witte,
Jacquelyn C. and Davies, Jonathan and van Malderen, Roeland
and Morris, Gary A. and Nakano, Tatsumi and Stübi, Rene},
title = {{A} new method to correct the electrochemical concentration
cell ({ECC}) ozonesonde time response and its implications
for “background current” and pump efficiency},
journal = {Atmospheric measurement techniques},
volume = {13},
number = {10},
issn = {1867-8548},
address = {Katlenburg-Lindau},
publisher = {Copernicus},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-00415},
pages = {5667 - 5680},
year = {2020},
abstract = {The electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozonesonde has
been the main instrument for in situ profiling of ozone
worldwide; yet, some details of its operation, which
contribute to the ozone uncertainty budget, are not well
understood. Here, we investigate the time response of the
chemical reactions inside the ECC and how corrections can be
used to remove some systematic biases. The analysis is based
on the understanding that two reaction pathways involving
ozone occur inside the ECC that generate electrical currents
on two very different timescales. The main fast-reaction
pathway with a time constant of about 20 s is due the
conversion of iodide to molecular iodine and the generation
of two free electrons per ozone molecule. A secondary
slow-reaction pathway involving the buffer generates an
excess current of about $2 \%–10 \%$ with a time
constant of about 25 min. This excess current can be
interpreted as what has conventionally been considered the
“background current”. This contribution can be
calculated and removed from the measured current instead of
the background current. Here we provide an algorithm to
calculate and remove the contribution of the slow-reaction
pathway and to correct for the time lag of the fast-reaction
pathway.This processing algorithm has been applied to
ozonesonde profiles at Costa Rica and during the Central
Equatorial Pacific Experiment (CEPEX) as well as to
laboratory experiments evaluating the performance of ECC
ozonesondes. At Costa Rica, where a $1 \% KI,$ 1/10th
buffer solution is used, there is no change in the derived
total ozone column; however, in the upper troposphere and
lower stratosphere, average reported ozone concentrations
increase by up to $7 \%$ and above 30 km decrease by up
to $7 \%.$ During CEPEX, where a $1 \% KI,$
full-buffer solution was used, ozone concentrations are
increased mostly in the upper troposphere, with no change
near the top of the profile. In the laboratory measurements,
the processing algorithms have been applied to measurements
using the majority of current sensing solutions and using
only the stronger pump efficiency correction reported by
Johnson et al. (2002). This improves the accuracy of the ECC
sonde ozone profiles, especially for low ozone
concentrations or large ozone gradients and removes
systematic biases relative to the reference instruments.In
the surface layer, operational procedures prior to launch,
in particular the use of filters, influence how typical
gradients above the surface are detected. The correction
algorithm may report gradients that are steeper than
originally reported, but their uncertainty is strongly
influenced by the prelaunch procedures.},
cin = {IEK-8},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013},
pnm = {243 - Tropospheric trace substances and their
transformation processes (POF3-243)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-243},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000586659500001},
doi = {10.5194/amt-13-5667-2020},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/889802},
}