% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Seiler:889897,
      author       = {Seiler, Jan and Volmer, Rahel and Krakau, Dennis and
                      Pöhls, Julien and Ossenkopp, Franziska and Schnabel, Lena
                      and Bardow, André},
      title        = {{C}apillary-assisted evaporation of water from finned tubes
                      – {I}mpacts of experimental setups and dynamics},
      journal      = {Applied thermal engineering},
      volume       = {165},
      issn         = {1359-4311},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2021-00505},
      pages        = {114620 -},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {Capillary-assisted thin-film evaporation is a promising
                      approach to overcome the heat transfer challenges associated
                      with sub-atmospheric evaporation of water in refrigeration
                      applications. Consequently, thin-film evaporation is
                      currently studied in several labs. However, so far it has
                      been unclear whether results from different labs can be
                      compared. In this work, we therefore investigate – for the
                      first time – the impact of experimental setups and
                      procedures on sub-atmospheric capillary-assisted thin-film
                      evaporation of the refrigerant water and deduce
                      methodological recommendations for improving reliability and
                      comparability of measurement results. We present results of
                      evaporation from finned copper tubes with decreasing filling
                      levels from two different experimental setups:At higher
                      driving force, the resulting dynamics of logarithmic mean
                      temperature differences, heat flows and overall heat
                      transfer coefficients determined in both setups are
                      generally in good agreement but absolute values show
                      deviations of up to $24\%.$ For lower driving forces, the
                      results are identical within uncertainty of measurement. We
                      conclude that the impact of experimental setup is important
                      when comparing absolute values from different setups, but
                      obtaining comparable results is generally possible.},
      cin          = {IEK-10},
      ddc          = {690},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-10-20170217},
      pnm          = {899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000503314300089},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114620},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/889897},
}