001     889912
005     20240712112854.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105010
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0921-3449
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1879-0658
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/26857
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:85968830
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a WOS:000569614800006
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2021-00520
082 _ _ |a 690
100 1 _ |a Meys, Raoul
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Towards a circular economy for plastic packaging wastes – the environmental potential of chemical recycling
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2020
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1611219021_17161
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Plastic packaging waste faces increasingly stringent sustainability targets such as recycling rates of 55% imposed by the European Commission. To realize the vision of a circular economy, chemical recycling is advocated as a large-scale avenue to decrease fossil resource depletion and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In this work, we develop a theoretical model for chemical recycling technologies assuming ideal performance. The theoretical model allows us to compute the minimal environmental impacts for chemical recycling technologies and compare them to real-case benchmark waste treatments. Thereby, we robustly identify chemical recycling technologies that will not result in environmental benefits, since their minimal environmental impacts are already higher than those of current benchmark waste treatments. In this way, we show that PET, HDPE, LDPE, PP and PS should not be recycled chemically to refinery feedstock or fuel products and rather be treated by mechanical recycling and energy recovery in cement kilns in order to reduce global warming impacts. In contrast, chemical recycling to monomers or value-added products could potentially reduce global warming impacts compared to all benchmark waste treatments by up to 4.3 kg CO2-eq per kg treated PET packaging waste. By analyzing 75 waste treatment scenarios for 5 environmental impacts, our analysis offers guidance to stakeholders involved in chemical recycling to identify the most promising as well as the least promising chemical recycling technologies.
536 _ _ |a 899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899
|c POF3-899
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Frick, Felicitas
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Westhues, Stefan
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Sternberg, André
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Klankermayer, Jürgen
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Bardow, André
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)172023
|b 5
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105010
|g Vol. 162, p. 105010 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1498716-8
|p 105010 -
|t Resources, conservation and recycling
|v 162
|y 2020
|x 0921-3449
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/889912/files/1-s2.0-S092134492030327X-main.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:889912
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a RWTH Aachen
|0 I:(DE-588b)36225-6
|k RWTH
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a RWTH Aachen
|0 I:(DE-588b)36225-6
|k RWTH
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a RWTH Aachen
|0 I:(DE-588b)36225-6
|k RWTH
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a RWTH Aachen
|0 I:(DE-588b)36225-6
|k RWTH
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a RWTH Aachen
|0 I:(DE-588b)36225-6
|k RWTH
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)172023
910 1 _ |a RWTH Aachen
|0 I:(DE-588b)36225-6
|k RWTH
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)172023
910 1 _ |a ETH Zürich
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)172023
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Programmungebundene Forschung
|l ohne Programm
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-890
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-800
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v ohne Topic
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2020-09-02
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2020-09-02
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
|d 2020-09-02
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2020-09-02
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
|d 2020-09-02
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b RESOUR CONSERV RECY : 2018
|d 2020-09-02
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2020-09-02
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2020-09-02
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b RESOUR CONSERV RECY : 2018
|d 2020-09-02
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2020-09-02
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2020-09-02
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2020-09-02
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2020-09-02
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-10-20170217
|k IEK-10
|l Modellierung von Energiesystemen
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-10-20170217
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-1-20170217


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21