% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Mller:889924,
      author       = {Müller, Leonard Jan and Kätelhön, Arne and Bachmann,
                      Marvin and Zimmermann, Arno and Sternberg, André and
                      Bardow, André},
      title        = {{A} {G}uideline for {L}ife {C}ycle {A}ssessment of {C}arbon
                      {C}apture and {U}tilization},
      journal      = {Frontiers in energy research},
      volume       = {8},
      issn         = {2296-598X},
      address      = {Lausanne},
      publisher    = {Frontiers Media},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2021-00532},
      pages        = {15},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {Carbon Capture and Utilization (CCU) is an emerging field
                      proposed for emissions mitigation and even negative
                      emissions. These potential benefits need to be assessed by
                      the holistic method of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) that
                      accounts for multiple environmental impact categories over
                      the entire life cycle of products or services. However, even
                      though LCA is a standardized method, current LCA practice
                      differs widely in methodological choices. The resulting LCA
                      studies show large variability which limits their value for
                      decision support. Applying LCA to CCU technologies leads to
                      further specific methodological issues, e.g., due to the
                      double role of CO2 as emission and feedstock. In this work,
                      we therefore present a comprehensive guideline for LCA of
                      CCU technologies. The guideline has been development in a
                      collaborative process involving over 40 experts and builds
                      upon existing LCA standards and guidelines. The presented
                      guidelines should improve comparability of LCA studies
                      through clear methodological guidance and predefined
                      assumptions on feedstock and utilities. Transparency is
                      increased through interpretation and reporting guidance.
                      Improved comparability should help to strengthen
                      knowledge-based decision-making. Consequently, research
                      funds and time can be allocated more efficiently for the
                      development of technologies for climate change mitigation
                      and negative emissions.},
      cin          = {IEK-10},
      ddc          = {333.7},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-10-20170217},
      pnm          = {899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000517449400001},
      doi          = {10.3389/fenrg.2020.00015},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/889924},
}