000889968 001__ 889968
000889968 005__ 20240712113240.0
000889968 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228682
000889968 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0378-7753
000889968 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1873-2755
000889968 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/27002
000889968 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:88025115
000889968 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000573641500001
000889968 037__ $$aFZJ-2021-00571
000889968 082__ $$a620
000889968 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRiedel, M.$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000889968 245__ $$aPressurized operation of solid oxide electrolysis stacks: An experimental comparison of the performance of 10-layer stacks with fuel electrode and electrolyte supported cell concepts
000889968 260__ $$aNew York, NY [u.a.]$$bElsevier$$c2020
000889968 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000889968 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000889968 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1611572828_2888
000889968 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000889968 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000889968 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000889968 520__ $$aThe electrochemical behavior of two different types of planar 10-layer solid oxide cell (SOC) stacks with having either fuel electrode supported cells or electrolyte supported cells, are examined under steam, co- and CO2 electrolysis at elevated pressures of up to 8 bar. Experiments with steady-state and dynamically recorded U(i)-characteristics are performed in order to evaluate the performances over a wide temperature range and for different operating conditions. Furthermore, the influence of the operating pressure is quantified via the temperature and pressure dependency of the related ASR values of each stack. Impedance analysis is conducted in order to investigate the major differences and the pressure effect on the specific process resistances during steam and CO2 electrolysis.In case of the stack with fuel electrode supported cells, the ASR is found to decrease significantly at elevated pressure leading to an overall performance gain, whereas the stack with electrolyte supported cells shows a minor pressure effect. An impedance study shows that the diffusion and activation resistances are significantly affected when conducting CO2 instead of H2O electrolysis for both stack concepts. Furthermore, the pressure sensitivity is found to be more dominant during CO2 electrolysis than during pure steam electrolysis operation.
000889968 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-135$$a135 - Fuel Cells (POF3-135)$$cPOF3-135$$fPOF III$$x0
000889968 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000889968 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHeddrich, M. P.$$b1
000889968 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aAnsar, A.$$b2
000889968 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145945$$aFang, Q.$$b3
000889968 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129828$$aBlum, Ludger$$b4$$ufzj
000889968 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aFriedrich, K. A.$$b5
000889968 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1491915-1$$a10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228682$$gVol. 475, p. 228682 -$$p228682 -$$tJournal of power sources$$v475$$x0378-7753$$y2020
000889968 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/889968/files/1-s2.0-S0378775320309861-main.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000889968 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:889968$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000889968 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)145945$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000889968 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129828$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
000889968 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-135$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-130$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bEnergie$$lSpeicher und vernetzte Infrastrukturen$$vFuel Cells$$x0
000889968 9141_ $$y2020
000889968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2020-09-04
000889968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2020-09-04
000889968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology$$d2020-09-04
000889968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2020-09-04
000889968 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
000889968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bJ POWER SOURCES : 2018$$d2020-09-04
000889968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9905$$2StatID$$aIF >= 5$$bJ POWER SOURCES : 2018$$d2020-09-04
000889968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2020-09-04
000889968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2020-09-04
000889968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000889968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2020-09-04
000889968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences$$d2020-09-04
000889968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2020-09-04
000889968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2020-09-04
000889968 920__ $$lyes
000889968 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-14-20191129$$kIEK-14$$lElektrochemische Verfahrenstechnik$$x0
000889968 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000889968 980__ $$ajournal
000889968 980__ $$aVDB
000889968 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000889968 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-14-20191129
000889968 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IET-4-20191129