% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Dombrowski:890099,
      author       = {Dombrowski, Olga and Hendricks Franssen, Harrie-Jan and
                      Brogi, Cosimo and Bogena, Heye Reemt},
      title        = {{P}erformance of the {ATMOS}41 {A}ll-in-{O}ne {W}eather
                      {S}tation for {W}eather {M}onitoring},
      journal      = {Sensors},
      volume       = {21},
      number       = {3},
      issn         = {1424-8220},
      address      = {Basel},
      publisher    = {MDPI},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2021-00688},
      pages        = {741 -},
      year         = {2021},
      abstract     = {Affordable and accurate weather monitoring systems are
                      essential in low-income anddeveloping countries and, more
                      recently, are needed in small-scale research such as
                      precision agricultureand urban climate studies. A variety of
                      low-cost solutions are available on the market, but theuse
                      of non-standard technologies raises concerns for data
                      quality. Research-grade all-in-one weatherstations could
                      present a reliable, cost effective solution while being
                      robust and easy to use. Thisstudy evaluates the performance
                      of the commercially available ATMOS41 all-in-one weather
                      station.Three stations were deployed next to a
                      high-performance reference station over a three-month
                      period.The ATMOS41 stations showed good performance compared
                      to the reference, and close agreementamong the three
                      stations for most standard weather variables. However,
                      measured atmosphericpressure showed uncertainties >0.6 hPa
                      and solar radiation was underestimated by $3\%,$ which
                      couldbe corrected with a locally obtained linear regression
                      function. Furthermore, precipitation measurementsshowed
                      considerable variability, with observed differences of
                      $7.5\%$ compared to the referencegauge, which suggests
                      relatively high susceptibility to wind-induced errors.
                      Overall, the station iswell suited for private user
                      applications such as farming, while the use in research
                      should considerthe limitations of the station, especially
                      regarding precise precipitation measurements.},
      cin          = {IBG-3},
      ddc          = {620},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
      pnm          = {2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact
                      (POF4-217)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {33499172},
      UT           = {WOS:000615506200001},
      doi          = {10.3390/s21030741},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/890099},
}