% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{BuerhopLutz:890181,
author = {Buerhop-Lutz, Claudia and Pickel, Tobias and Winkler, Thilo
and Stroyuk, Oleksandr and Camus, Ch and Neswal, M. and
Heindl, M. and Peters, Ian Marius and Hauch, Jens},
title = {{PV}-{M}odule’s {B}acksheet {C}ompositions {A}ffecting
{PV}-{S}ystem’s {Y}ield and {D}egradation},
publisher = {WIP},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-00770},
pages = {1512 - 1516},
year = {2020},
note = {funded by BMWi, COSIMA, FKZ: 032429A},
abstract = {This study links chemical analysis of PV-module’s
backsheet components with the monitored yield andvoltage of
PV. WE investigated several PV-systems all with two or more
module types and differing backsheet types. Weidentified
three classes of backsheets with respect to their influence
on module performance. First, double-fluoropolymersare
robust and modules perform constantly well over years.
Second, non-fluoropolymers, show approximately
linearperformance and degradation and third,
single-fluoropolymers show drastic performance losses,
including inverter shutdowns. Humidity was identified as an
important driving factor for the faster ageing process of
modules with criticalbacksheets und isolation issues. A
correlation between obvious backsheet defects, e. g. cracks
or isolation issues andinverter shut-downs was not found.},
month = {Sep},
date = {2020-09-07},
organization = {37th European Photovoltaic Solar
Energy Conference and Exhibition,
virtuell (Portugal), 7 Sep 2020 - 11
Sep 2020},
cin = {IEK-11},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-11-20140314},
pnm = {121 - Solar cells of the next generation (POF3-121)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-121},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)8},
doi = {10.4229/EUPVSEC20202020-5CV.3.9},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/890181},
}