000890236 001__ 890236
000890236 005__ 20240712101031.0
000890236 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.5194/amt-2019-146
000890236 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/27046
000890236 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:61012886
000890236 037__ $$aFZJ-2021-00823
000890236 082__ $$a550
000890236 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPerim de Faria, Julia$$b0
000890236 245__ $$aLaboratory Validation and Field Deployment of a Compact Single-Scattering Albedo (SSA) Monitor
000890236 260__ $$aKatlenburg-Lindau$$bCopernicus$$c2019
000890236 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000890236 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000890236 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1611657527_21864
000890236 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000890236 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000890236 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000890236 520__ $$aAbstract. An evaluation of the performance and accuracy of a Cavity Attenuated Phase-Shift Single Scattering Albedo Monitor (CAPS PMssa, Aerodyne Res. Inc.) was conducted in an optical closure study with proven technologies: Cavity Attenuated Phase-Shift Particle Extinction Monitor (CAPS PMex, Aerodyne Res. Inc.); 3-wavelengh Integrating Nephelometer (TSI Model 3563); and 3-wavelength filter-based Particle Soot Absorption Photometer (PSAP, Radiance Research). The evaluation was conducted by connecting the instruments to a controlled aerosol generation system and comparing the measured scattering, extinction, and absorption coefficients measured by the CAPS PMssa with the independent measurements. Three different particle types were used to generate aerosol samples with single-scattering albedos (SSA) ranging from 0.4 to 1.0 at 630 nm wavelength. The CAPS PMssa measurements compared well with the proven technologies. Extinction measurement comparisons exhibited a slope of the linear regression line for the full data set of 0.96 (−0.02/&plus;0.06), an intercept near zero, and a regression coefficient R2 > 0.99; whereas, scattering measurements had a slope of 1.01 (−0.07/&plus;0.06), an intercept of less than &plus;/−2 × 10−6 m−1 (Mm−1), and a coefficient R2 ∼ 1.0. The derived CAPS PMssa absorption compared well to the PSAP measurements at low levels (< 70 Mm−1) for the small particle sizes and modest (0.4 to 0.6) SSA values tested, with a linear regression slope of 1.0, an intercept of −4 Mm−1, and a coefficient R2 = 0.97. Comparisons at higher particle loadings were compromised by loading effects on the PSAP filters. For the SSA measurements, agreement was highest (regression slopes within 1% ) for SSA = 1.0 particles, though the difference between the measured values increased to 9 % for extinction coefficients lower than 55 Mm−1. SSA measurements for absorbing particles exhibited absolute differences up to 18 %, though it is not clear which measurement had the lowest accuracy. For a given particle type, the CAPS PMssa instrument exhibited the lowest scatter around the average. This study demonstrates that the CAPS PMssa is a robust and reliable instrument for the direct measurement of the scattering and extinction coefficients and thus SSA. This conclusion also holds as well for the indirect measurement of the absorption coefficient with the constraint that the accuracy of this particular measurement degrades as the SSA and particle size increases.
000890236 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-243$$a243 - Tropospheric trace substances and their transformation processes (POF3-243)$$cPOF3-243$$fPOF III$$x0
000890236 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000890236 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)159541$$aBundke, Ulrich$$b1$$eCorresponding author
000890236 7001_ $$00000-0002-5598-6626$$aFreedman, Andrew$$b2
000890236 7001_ $$00000-0001-7796-7840$$aOnasch, Timothy B.$$b3
000890236 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)136669$$aPetzold, Andreas$$b4
000890236 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2507817-3$$a10.5194/amt-2019-146$$p $$tAtmospheric measurement techniques discussions$$v146$$x1867-8610$$y2019
000890236 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/890236/files/amt-2019-146-1.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000890236 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:890236$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000890236 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)159541$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000890236 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)136669$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
000890236 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-243$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-240$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lAtmosphäre und Klima$$vTropospheric trace substances and their transformation processes$$x0
000890236 9141_ $$y2020
000890236 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000890236 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000890236 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2020-09-15
000890236 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2020-09-15
000890236 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013$$kIEK-8$$lTroposphäre$$x0
000890236 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000890236 980__ $$ajournal
000890236 980__ $$aVDB
000890236 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000890236 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013
000890236 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-3-20101013