% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Schreiner:890290,
author = {Schreiner, Benjamin and Pfeilsticker, Klaus and Kluge,
Flora and Rotermund, Meike and Zahn, Andreas and Ziereis,
Helmut and Bohn, Birger and Schneider, Johannes and Kaiser,
Katharina and Pozzer, Andrea and Mertens, Mariano},
title = {{A}ircraft measurements of nitrous acid in excess of model
predictions in the boundary layer and free troposphere},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-00871},
year = {2020},
abstract = {<p>Middle and long-term $\ photo-chemical$ effects of
local and regional pollution are not well quantified and are
an area of active study. NO<sub>x</sub> (here defined as NO,
NO<sub>2</sub>, and HONO) is a regional pollutant, which
influences atmospheric oxidation capacity and ozone
formation. Airborne measurements of atmospheric trace gases
from the HALO (High Altitude Long Range) aircraft,
particularly of NO, NO<sub>2</sub>, and HONO were performed
as part of the EMeRGe (Effect of Megacities on the Transport
and Transformation of Pollutants on the Regional to Global
Scales) campaign over continental Europe and southeast Asia
in July 2017 and April 2018, respectively. NO (and
NO<sub>Y</sub>), O<sub>3</sub>, and the photolysis
frequencies of NO<sub>2</sub> and HONO were measured
in-situ. NO<sub>2</sub> and HONO were inferred from Limb
measurements of the mini-DOAS (Differential Optical
Absorption Spectroscopy) instrument, using the novel scaling
method $(H\üneke$ et al., 2017). These measurements
were compared with simulations of the MECO/EMAC models. In
relatively polluted air-masses in the boundary layer and
free troposphere, HONO measured in excess of model
predictions (and previous measurements) suggests an in-situ
formation and a significant source of OH as well as a
pathway for re-noxification. Aerosol composition
simultaneously measured $\ by$ the C-Tof-AMS instrument
may reveal potential reaction mechanisms to explain the
$discrepancy.\ </p>$},
month = {May},
date = {2020-05-04},
organization = {EGU 2020, Online (online), 4 May 2020
- 8 May 2020},
subtyp = {Other},
cin = {IEK-8},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013},
pnm = {243 - Tropospheric trace substances and their
transformation processes (POF3-243)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-243},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)6},
doi = {10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-13607},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/890290},
}