% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Lahnaoui:890371,
      author       = {Lahnaoui, Amin and Wulf, Christina and Dalmazzone, Didier},
      title        = {{O}ptimization of hydrogen cost and transport technology in
                      {F}rance and {G}ermany for various production and demand
                      scenarios.},
      journal      = {Energies},
      volume       = {14},
      number       = {3},
      issn         = {1996-1073},
      address      = {Basel},
      publisher    = {MDPI},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2021-00916},
      pages        = {744 -},
      year         = {2021},
      abstract     = {Green hydrogen for mobility represents an alternative to
                      conventional fuel to decarbonize the transportation sector.
                      Nevertheless, the thermodynamic properties make the
                      transport and the storage of this energy carrier at standard
                      conditions inefficient. Therefore, this study deploys a
                      georeferenced optimal transport infrastructure for four base
                      case scenarios in France and Germany that differs by
                      production distribution based on wind power potential and
                      demand capacities for the mobility sector at different
                      penetration shares for 2030 and 2050. The restrained
                      transport network to the road infrastructure allows focusing
                      on the optimum combination of trucks operating at different
                      states of aggregations and storage technologies and its
                      impact on the annual cost and hydrogen flow using linear
                      programming. Furthermore, four other scenarios with
                      production cost investigate the impact of upstream supply
                      chain cost, and eight scenarios with daily transport and
                      storage optimization analyse the modeling method
                      sensitivity. The results show that compressed hydrogen gas
                      at a high presser level around 500 bar was, on average, a
                      better option. However, at an early stage of hydrogen fuel
                      penetration, substituting compressed gas at low to medium
                      pressure levels by liquid organic hydrogen carrier minimizes
                      the transport and storage costs. Finally, in France,
                      hydrogen production matches population distribution, in
                      contrast to Germany, which suffers from supply and demand
                      disparity.},
      cin          = {IEK-STE},
      ddc          = {620},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
      pnm          = {111 - Energiesystemtransformation (POF4-111)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-111},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000615056900001},
      doi          = {10.3390/en14030744},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/890371},
}