guest ::
| Home > Publications database > Combining Different Docking Engines and Consensus Strategies to Design and Validate Optimized Virtual Screening Protocols for the SARS-CoV-2 3CL Protease > print |
| Home > Publications database > Combining Different Docking Engines and Consensus Strategies to Design and Validate Optimized Virtual Screening Protocols for the SARS-CoV-2 3CL Protease > print |
| 001 | 890453 | ||
| 005 | 20240625095118.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.3390/molecules26040797 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2128/27140 |2 Handle |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 33557115 |2 pmid |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000624153100001 |2 WOS |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2021-00969 |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 540 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Manelfi, Candida |0 0000-0002-9175-243X |b 0 |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Combining Different Docking Engines and Consensus Strategies to Design and Validate Optimized Virtual Screening Protocols for the SARS-CoV-2 3CL Protease |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Basel |c 2021 |b MDPI70206 |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1641839447_21106 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a The 3CL-Protease appears to be a very promising medicinal target to develop anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents. The availability of resolved structures allows structure-based computational approaches to be carried out even though the lack of known inhibitors prevents a proper validation of the performed simulations. The innovative idea of the study is to exploit known inhibitors of SARS-CoV 3CL-Pro as a training set to perform and validate multiple virtual screening campaigns. Docking simulations using four different programs (Fred, Glide, LiGen, and PLANTS) were performed investigating the role of both multiple binding modes (by binding space) and multiple isomers/states (by developing the corresponding isomeric space). The computed docking scores were used to develop consensus models, which allow an in-depth comparison of the resulting performances. On average, the reached performances revealed the different sensitivity to isomeric differences and multiple binding modes between the four docking engines. In detail, Glide and LiGen are the tools that best benefit from isomeric and binding space, respectively, while Fred is the most insensitive program. The obtained results emphasize the fruitful role of combining various docking tools to optimize the predictive performances. Taken together, the performed simulations allowed the rational development of highly performing virtual screening workflows, which could be further optimized by considering different 3CL-Pro structures and, more importantly, by including true SARS-CoV-2 3CL-Pro inhibitors (as learning set) when available. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 525 - Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction (POF4-525) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525 |c POF4-525 |f POF IV |x 0 |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 5111 - Domain-Specific Simulation & Data Life Cycle Labs (SDLs) and Research Groups (POF4-511) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5111 |c POF4-511 |f POF IV |x 1 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Gossen, Jonas |0 P:(DE-Juel1)172836 |b 1 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Gervasoni, Silvia |0 0000-0002-5731-3396 |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Talarico, Carmine |0 0000-0003-4789-0955 |b 3 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Albani, Simone |0 P:(DE-Juel1)181061 |b 4 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Philipp, Benjamin Joseph |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 5 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Musiani, Francesco |0 0000-0003-0200-1712 |b 6 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Vistoli, Giulio |0 0000-0002-3939-5172 |b 7 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Rossetti, Giulia |0 P:(DE-Juel1)145921 |b 8 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Beccari, Andrea Rosario |0 0000-0001-6830-2695 |b 9 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Pedretti, Alessandro |0 0000-0001-5916-2029 |b 10 |e Corresponding author |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.3390/molecules26040797 |g Vol. 26, no. 4, p. 797 - |0 PERI:(DE-600)2008644-1 |n 4 |p 797 - |t Molecules |v 26 |y 2021 |x 1420-3049 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/890453/files/molecules-26-00797.pdf |y OpenAccess |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:890453 |p openaire |p open_access |p VDB |p driver |p dnbdelivery |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 1 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)172836 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 4 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)181061 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 8 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)145921 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Key Technologies |l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction |x 0 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Key Technologies |l Engineering Digital Futures – Supercomputing, Data Management and Information Security for Knowledge and Action |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-510 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-511 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Enabling Computational- & Data-Intensive Science and Engineering |9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5111 |x 1 |
| 913 | 0 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Key Technologies |l Decoding the Human Brain |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Theory, modelling and simulation |x 0 |
| 913 | 0 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Key Technologies |l Supercomputing & Big Data |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-510 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Computational Science and Mathematical Methods |x 1 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2021 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |d 2020-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160 |2 StatID |b Essential Science Indicators |d 2020-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4 |2 HGFVOC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600 |2 StatID |b Ebsco Academic Search |d 2020-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b MOLECULES : 2018 |d 2020-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501 |2 StatID |b DOAJ Seal |d 2020-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500 |2 StatID |b DOAJ |d 2020-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |d 2020-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Fees |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700 |2 StatID |d 2020-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2020-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a IF < 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900 |2 StatID |d 2020-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b ASC |d 2020-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Article Processing Charges |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561 |2 StatID |d 2020-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences |d 2020-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2020-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320 |2 StatID |b PubMed Central |d 2020-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2020-08-26 |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-9-20140121 |k INM-9 |l Computational Biomedicine |x 0 |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406 |k JSC |l Jülich Supercomputing Center |x 1 |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-5-20120330 |k IAS-5 |l Computational Biomedicine |x 2 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-9-20140121 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-5-20120330 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|