001     890505
005     20240711113722.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1088/1361-6587/abc519
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0032-1028
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0368-3281
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0741-3335
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1361-6587
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1879-2979
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2057-7648
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/27141
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:94579679
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a WOS:000590402800001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2021-01000
082 _ _ |a 620
100 1 _ |a Ertmer, Stephan
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)169120
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Measurements of the energy distribution of W atoms sputtered by low energy Ar ions using high-resolution Doppler spectroscopy
260 _ _ |a Bristol
|c 2021
|b IOP Publ.
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1613046961_4128
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Emission spectra of neural tungsten (W) sputtered by impact of argon (Ar) ions in a weakly magnetized (<0.1 T) Ar plasma were measured using a high resolution spectrometer at normal incidence angle to the surface. The measurements were performed for the mono-energetic impact energies between 70 and 150 eV using the neutral tungsten (W I) line at 4982.593 Å. The line shape of this line was simulated using a Doppler-shifted emission model to determine the energy distribution. Additional broadening mechanisms were taken into account: instrumental broadening, Zeeman effect and finally the photon or light reflectance at the W surface.The obtained energy distribution was found in a very good agreement with the Thompson distribution, even though deviations for lower impact energies are observed, e.g. the high-energy tail of sputtered particles demonstrates a faster drop compared to 1/E2 at energies below 100 eV. Moreover, the standard cosine (Knudsen cosine law) distribution provides a rather good description of emission spectra in the energy range of study. Finally, the energy distribution was also compared with simulations carried out with the binary collision approximation (BCA) based Monte-Carlo code SDTrimSP. It shows a marginally worse description at low energies and better description of the high energy tail compared to the Thompson one. Furthermore, the model was used to determine in-situ the degree of light reflection at the W surface. The results are in excellent agreement with the literature data.
536 _ _ |a 134 - Plasma-Wand-Wechselwirkung (POF4-134)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-134
|c POF4-134
|x 0
|f POF IV
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Marchuk, Oleksandr
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)5739
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Dickheuer, Sven Oliver Oliver
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)165722
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Brezinsek, Sebastijan
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129976
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Boerner, Petra
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)5011
|b 4
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Schmitz, Janina
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)166256
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Kreter, Arkadi
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130070
|b 6
773 _ _ |a 10.1088/1361-6587/abc519
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1473144-7
|n 1
|p 015008
|t Plasma physics and controlled fusion
|v 63
|y 2021
|x 1361-6587
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/890505/files/Ertmer_2021_Plasma_Phys._Control._Fusion_63_015008.pdf
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |y Published on 2020-11-18. Available in OpenAccess from 2021-11-18.
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/890505/files/Postprint%20Ertmer_Measurements%20of%20the%20energy%20distribution.pdf
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:890505
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)169120
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)5739
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129976
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)5011
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130070
913 0 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Energie
|l Kernfusion
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-170
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-174
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Plasma-Wall-Interaction
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Fusion
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-130
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-134
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Plasma-Wand-Wechselwirkung
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1230
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Electronics and Telecommunications Collection
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a Embargoed OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0530
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b PLASMA PHYS CONTR F : 2018
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a National-Konsortium
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0430
|2 StatID
|d 2020-08-21
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2020-08-21
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2020-08-21
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2020-08-21
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013
|k IEK-4
|l Plasmaphysik
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IFN-1-20101013


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21