% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Bates:890511,
author = {Bates, Jordan and Montzka, Carsten and Schmidt, Marius and
Jonard, François},
title = {{E}stimating {C}anopy {D}ensity {P}arameters
{T}ime-{S}eries for {W}inter {W}heat {U}sing {UAS} {M}ounted
{L}i{DAR}},
journal = {Remote sensing},
volume = {13},
number = {4},
issn = {2072-4292},
address = {Basel},
publisher = {MDPI},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-01002},
pages = {710 -},
year = {2021},
abstract = {Monitoring of canopy density with related metrics such as
leaf area index (LAI) makes a significant contribution to
understanding and predicting processes in the
soil–plant–atmosphere system and to indicating crop
health and potential yield for farm management. Remote
sensing methods using optical sensors that rely on spectral
reflectance to calculate LAI have become more mainstream due
to easy entry and availability. Methods with vegetation
indices (VI) based on multispectral reflectance data
essentially measure the green area index (GAI) or response
to chlorophyll content of the canopy surface and not the
entire aboveground biomass that may be present from
non-green elements that are key to fully assessing the
carbon budget. Methods with light detection and ranging
(LiDAR) have started to emerge using gap fraction (GF) to
estimate the plant area index (PAI) based on canopy density.
These LiDAR methods have the main advantage of being
sensitive to both green and non-green plant elements. They
have primarily been applied to forest cover with manned
airborne LiDAR systems (ALS) and have yet to be used
extensively with crops such as winter wheat using LiDAR on
unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). This study contributes to a
better understanding of the potential of LiDAR as a tool to
estimate canopy structure in precision farming. The LiDAR
method proved to have a high to moderate correlation in
spatial variation to the multispectral method. The
LiDAR-derived PAI values closely resemble the SunScan
Ceptometer GAI ground measurements taken early in the
growing season before major stages of senescence. Later in
the growing season, when the canopy density was at its
highest, a possible overestimation may have occurred. This
was most likely due to the chosen flight parameters not
providing the best depictions of canopy density with
consideration of the LiDAR’s perspective, as the
ground-based destructive measurements provided lower values
of PAI. Additionally, a distinction between total
LiDAR-derived PAI, multispectral-derived GAI, and brown area
index (BAI) is made to show how the active and passive
optical sensor methods used in this study can complement
each other throughout the growing season.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {620},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {217 - Für eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von
Ressourcen zu Produkten (POF4-217) / 2173 -
Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact
(POF4-217) / DFG project 390732324 - EXC 2070: PhenoRob -
Robotik und Phänotypisierung für Nachhaltige
Nutzpflanzenproduktion},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173 /
G:(GEPRIS)390732324},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000624431000001},
doi = {10.3390/rs13040710},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/890511},
}