000891017 001__ 891017
000891017 005__ 20230815122839.0
000891017 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3389/fagro.2021.622367
000891017 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/27340
000891017 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:100770259
000891017 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:001009890900001
000891017 037__ $$aFZJ-2021-01313
000891017 041__ $$aEnglish
000891017 082__ $$a630
000891017 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)165987$$aLandl, Magdalena$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000891017 245__ $$aModeling the Impact of Rhizosphere Bulk Density and Mucilage Gradients on Root Water Uptake
000891017 260__ $$aLausanne$$bFrontiers Media$$c2021
000891017 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000891017 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000891017 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1637846134_14846
000891017 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000891017 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000891017 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000891017 520__ $$aIn models of water flow in soil and roots, differences in the soil hydraulic properties of the rhizosphere and the bulk soil are usually neglected. There is, however, strong experimental evidence that rhizosphere and bulk soil hydraulic properties differ significantly from each other due to various root-soil interaction processes. Two such processes, which can also influence each other, are rhizosphere loosening or compaction and mucilage deposition. In this work, we identified realistic gradients in rhizosphere bulk density and mucilage concentration using X-ray CT imaging, respectively, model simulation for two different soil types and soil bulk densities and related them to soil hydraulic parameters. Using a 1D-single-root model, we then evaluated both the individual and combined effects of these gradients on soil water dynamics using scenario simulations. We showed that during soil drying, a lower rhizosphere bulk density leads to an earlier onset of water stress and to a reduced root water uptake that is sustained longer. The presence of mucilage led to a faster reduction of root water uptake. This is due to the stronger effect of mucilage viscosity on hydraulic conductivity compared to the mucilage- induced increase in water retention. Root water uptake was rapidly reduced when both mucilage and rhizosphere bulk density gradients were considered. The intensity of the effect of gradients in rhizosphere bulk density and mucilage concentration depended strongly on the interplay between initial soil hydraulic conditions, soil type and soil bulk densities. Both gradients in rhizosphere bulk density and mucilage concentration appear as a measure to sustain transpiration at a lower level and to avoid fast dehydration.
000891017 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173$$a2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact (POF4-217)$$cPOF4-217$$fPOF IV$$x0
000891017 536__ $$0G:(GEPRIS)403641034$$aDFG project 403641034 - Modellierung von Selbstorganisation in der Rhizosphäre $$c403641034$$x1
000891017 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000891017 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPhalempin, Maxime$$b1
000891017 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchlüter, Steffen$$b2
000891017 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aVetterlein, Doris$$b3
000891017 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129548$$aVanderborght, Jan$$b4$$ufzj
000891017 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKroener, Eva$$b5
000891017 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)157922$$aSchnepf, Andrea$$b6$$ufzj
000891017 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)3017794-7$$a10.3389/fagro.2021.622367$$gVol. 3, p. 622367$$p622367$$tFrontiers in agronomy$$v3$$x2673-3218$$y2021
000891017 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/891017/files/Landl_Modeling%20the%20impact%20of%20rhizosphere%20bulk%20density%20and%20mucilage%20gradients%20on%20root%20water%20uptake.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000891017 8767_ $$d2021-03-29$$eAPC$$jDeposit$$lDeposit: Frontiers$$z$ 1615.00
000891017 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:891017$$pdnbdelivery$$popenCost$$pVDB$$pdriver$$pOpenAPC$$popen_access$$popenaire
000891017 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)165987$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000891017 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129548$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
000891017 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)157922$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b6$$kFZJ
000891017 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt$$lErde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten$$vFür eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten$$x0
000891017 9130_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000891017 9141_ $$y2021
000891017 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000891017 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2020-08-26
000891017 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2020-08-26
000891017 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000891017 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Peer review$$d2020-08-26
000891017 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2020-08-26
000891017 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2020-08-26
000891017 920__ $$lyes
000891017 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000891017 980__ $$ajournal
000891017 980__ $$aVDB
000891017 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000891017 980__ $$aAPC
000891017 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000891017 9801_ $$aAPC
000891017 9801_ $$aFullTexts