Gast ::
| Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Modeling the Impact of Rhizosphere Bulk Density and Mucilage Gradients on Root Water Uptake > print |
| Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Modeling the Impact of Rhizosphere Bulk Density and Mucilage Gradients on Root Water Uptake > print |
| 001 | 891017 | ||
| 005 | 20230815122839.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.3389/fagro.2021.622367 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2128/27340 |2 Handle |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:100770259 |2 altmetric |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:001009890900001 |2 WOS |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2021-01313 |
| 041 | _ | _ | |a English |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 630 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Landl, Magdalena |0 P:(DE-Juel1)165987 |b 0 |e Corresponding author |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Modeling the Impact of Rhizosphere Bulk Density and Mucilage Gradients on Root Water Uptake |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Lausanne |c 2021 |b Frontiers Media |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1637846134_14846 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a In models of water flow in soil and roots, differences in the soil hydraulic properties of the rhizosphere and the bulk soil are usually neglected. There is, however, strong experimental evidence that rhizosphere and bulk soil hydraulic properties differ significantly from each other due to various root-soil interaction processes. Two such processes, which can also influence each other, are rhizosphere loosening or compaction and mucilage deposition. In this work, we identified realistic gradients in rhizosphere bulk density and mucilage concentration using X-ray CT imaging, respectively, model simulation for two different soil types and soil bulk densities and related them to soil hydraulic parameters. Using a 1D-single-root model, we then evaluated both the individual and combined effects of these gradients on soil water dynamics using scenario simulations. We showed that during soil drying, a lower rhizosphere bulk density leads to an earlier onset of water stress and to a reduced root water uptake that is sustained longer. The presence of mucilage led to a faster reduction of root water uptake. This is due to the stronger effect of mucilage viscosity on hydraulic conductivity compared to the mucilage- induced increase in water retention. Root water uptake was rapidly reduced when both mucilage and rhizosphere bulk density gradients were considered. The intensity of the effect of gradients in rhizosphere bulk density and mucilage concentration depended strongly on the interplay between initial soil hydraulic conditions, soil type and soil bulk densities. Both gradients in rhizosphere bulk density and mucilage concentration appear as a measure to sustain transpiration at a lower level and to avoid fast dehydration. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact (POF4-217) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173 |c POF4-217 |x 0 |f POF IV |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a DFG project 403641034 - Modellierung von Selbstorganisation in der Rhizosphäre |0 G:(GEPRIS)403641034 |c 403641034 |x 1 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Phalempin, Maxime |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 1 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Schlüter, Steffen |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Vetterlein, Doris |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 3 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Vanderborght, Jan |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129548 |b 4 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Kroener, Eva |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 5 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Schnepf, Andrea |0 P:(DE-Juel1)157922 |b 6 |u fzj |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.3389/fagro.2021.622367 |g Vol. 3, p. 622367 |0 PERI:(DE-600)3017794-7 |p 622367 |t Frontiers in agronomy |v 3 |y 2021 |x 2673-3218 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/891017/files/Landl_Modeling%20the%20impact%20of%20rhizosphere%20bulk%20density%20and%20mucilage%20gradients%20on%20root%20water%20uptake.pdf |y OpenAccess |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:891017 |p openaire |p open_access |p OpenAPC |p driver |p VDB |p openCost |p dnbdelivery |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 0 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)165987 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 4 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)129548 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 6 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)157922 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt |l Erde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Für eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten |9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173 |x 0 |
| 913 | 0 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Erde und Umwelt |l Terrestrische Umwelt |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction |x 0 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2021 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4 |2 HGFVOC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501 |2 StatID |b DOAJ Seal |d 2020-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500 |2 StatID |b DOAJ |d 2020-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b DOAJ : Peer review |d 2020-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Article Processing Charges |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561 |2 StatID |d 2020-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Fees |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700 |2 StatID |d 2020-08-26 |
| 920 | _ | _ | |l yes |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |k IBG-3 |l Agrosphäre |x 0 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a APC |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a APC |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|