% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Guillemoles:891397,
author = {Guillemoles, Jean-Francois and Kirchartz, Thomas and Cahen,
David and Rau, Uwe},
title = {{R}eply to ‘{I}deal solar cell efficiencies’},
journal = {Nature photonics},
volume = {15},
number = {3},
issn = {1749-4893},
address = {London [u.a.]},
publisher = {Nature Publ. Group},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-01485},
pages = {165 - 166},
year = {2021},
abstract = {We wrote our Comment1 as a brief and concise guide to the
Shockley–Queisser (SQ) model2, chiefly aiming to explain
how real-world solar cells (non-concentrating,
single-junction) must be related to the efficiency limits
that result from the SQ model. There is a need for such a
Comment, especially in the context of a widened portfolio of
new very efficient solar cell materials and a rapidly
growing community. As obvious from the title1, we target
non-specialist readers. Such approach3 has the risk that the
resulting text is unsatisfactory for specialist readers. The
author of the Correspondence on our Comment4 is certainly
such specialist reader. Thus, to reply to the Correspondence
we need to leave the level at which we presented the topic
in our Comment, to make clear that while there can be
differences of opinion as how to explain the issue to the
‘perplexed’, what is written in our comment is a valid
description of the SQ model.},
cin = {IEK-5},
ddc = {530},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-5-20101013},
pnm = {121 - Photovoltaik und Windenergie (POF4-121)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-121},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000621265000002},
doi = {10.1038/s41566-021-00775-1},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/891397},
}