001     891482
005     20240708133149.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112460
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0920-3796
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1873-7196
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/27518
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000674482900005
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2021-01556
082 _ _ |a 530
100 1 _ |a Luís, R.
|0 0000-0001-8949-0402
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Nuclear analysis of the DEMO divertor survey visible high-resolution spectrometer
260 _ _ |a New York, NY [u.a.]
|c 2021
|b Elsevier
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1617951532_9159
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Spectroscopic measurements have been recently proposed in DEMO for divertor detachment control. In its current design, the DEMO Divertor Survey Visible High-Resolution Spectrometer is foreseen to perform spectroscopy measurements by integrating three optical subsystems into an equatorial port (EP). Behind the first wall, light travels through a set of metallic mirrors and ducts before it reaches the closure plate of the EP. This paper presents a nuclear analysis performed with the Monte Carlo simulation program MCNP6 for two alternative configurations of the system. The results show that the configuration with 5 mirrors per transmission line is very effective to reduce the neutron streaming through the port. However, it will not be possible, with the current design, to introduce standard electronics along the spectroscopy ducts, as the dose rate limits for non-critical electronic components are exceeded in both configurations. In the plasma-facing mirrors, the heat loads are below 2 mW/cm3, which shows that the strategy of recessing the first mirrors and placing them behind small-diameter openings is effective to decrease the loads in the mirrors. FISPACT simulations for different materials show that material transmutation in the mirrors will be negligible throughout the DEMO reactor lifetime.
536 _ _ |a 134 - Plasma-Wand-Wechselwirkung (POF4-134)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-134
|c POF4-134
|x 0
|f POF IV
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Nietiadi, Y.
|0 0000-0002-3471-8569
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Silva, A.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)166322
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Gonçalves, B.
|0 0000-0003-0670-1214
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Franke, T.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Biel, W.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129967
|b 5
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112460
|g Vol. 169, p. 112460 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1492280-0
|p 112460 -
|t Fusion engineering and design
|v 169
|y 2021
|x 0920-3796
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/891482/files/postprint_Biel_Nuclear%20Analysis%20of%20the%20DEMO.pdf
|y Published on 2021-03-23. Available in OpenAccess from 2023-03-23.
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:891482
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129967
913 0 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Energie
|l Kernfusion
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-170
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-174
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Plasma-Wall-Interaction
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Fusion
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-130
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-134
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Plasma-Wand-Wechselwirkung
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a Embargoed OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0530
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b FUSION ENG DES : 2019
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-27
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2021-01-27
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013
|k IEK-4
|l Plasmaphysik
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IFN-1-20101013


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21