001     891485
005     20240712112955.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111005
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1364-0321
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1879-0690
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/27565
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000649678100004
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2021-01559
082 _ _ |a 620
100 1 _ |a Carigiet, Fabian
|0 0000-0001-6033-940X
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Long-term power degradation analysis of crystalline silicon PV modules using indoor and outdoor measurement techniques
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2021
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1618207791_26753
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Annual degradation rates of PV modules are important in the yield prediction. For a high-quality PV module, these rates are lower than the measurement uncertainty of a nominal power measurement performed in todays most advanced certified photovoltaic reference laboratory. Therefore, the analysis requires a well thought out methodology that can compare the data relative to each other or relative to an unused module stored in the dark on an annual base. Over the past 10 years, several multi c-Si and HIT modules have been accurately monitored in a string and single module setup by an outdoor performance measurement system. Additionally, all modules have been dismantled and measured using an indoor flasher measurement system once every year. With this unique measurement setup, the annual degradation rates of multi c-Si modules and HIT modules are quantified based on three different analysis methodologies. The multi c-Si modules showed an average annual degradation rate of 0.18% ± 0.06% and 0.29% ± 0.06% measured by the outdoor and indoor system, respectively. The indoor analysis of the HIT modules yielded an average annual degradation of 0.26% ± 0.05%. That corresponds to half of the degradation observed by the outdoor analysis method. Further evaluations of the performance ratio PR confirmed the results gained by the indoor methodology. The comparison of the standard PR with a temperature-corrected PR’STC for both technologies showed that the benefit of the lower temperature coefficient of the HIT technology is eliminated by its worse low light behaviour.
536 _ _ |a 121 - Photovoltaik und Windenergie (POF4-121)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-121
|c POF4-121
|x 0
|f POF IV
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Brabec, Christoph
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)176427
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Baumgartner, Franz P.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111005
|g Vol. 144, p. 111005 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2019940-5
|p 111005 -
|t Renewable & sustainable energy reviews
|v 144
|y 2021
|x 1364-0321
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/891485/files/1-s2.0-S1364032121002951-main.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:891485
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a External Institute
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|k Extern
|b 0
|6 0000-0001-6033-940X
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)176427
910 1 _ |a External Institute
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|k Extern
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
913 0 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Energie
|l Erneuerbare Energien
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-120
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-121
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Solar cells of the next generation
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Materialien und Technologien für die Energiewende (MTET)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-120
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-121
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Photovoltaik und Windenergie
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b RENEW SUST ENERG REV : 2019
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a IF >= 10
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9910
|2 StatID
|b RENEW SUST ENERG REV : 2019
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-27
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2021-01-27
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-11-20140314
|k IEK-11
|l Helmholtz-Institut Erlangen-Nürnberg Erneuerbare Energien
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-11-20140314
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IET-2-20140314


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21