% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{DeGrave:891684,
author = {De Grave, Charlotte and Pipia, Luca and Siegmann, Bastian
and Morcillo-Pallarés, Pablo and Rivera-Caicedo, Juan Pablo
and Moreno, José and Verrelst, Jochem},
title = {{R}etrieving and {V}alidating {L}eaf and {C}anopy
{C}hlorophyll {C}ontent at {M}oderate {R}esolution: {A}
{M}ultiscale {A}nalysis with the {S}entinel-3 {OLCI}
{S}ensor},
journal = {Remote sensing},
volume = {13},
number = {8},
issn = {2072-4292},
address = {Basel},
publisher = {MDPI},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-01667},
pages = {1419 -},
year = {2021},
abstract = {ESA’s Eighth Earth Explorer mission “FLuorescence
EXplorer” (FLEX) will be dedicated to the global
monitoring of the chlorophyll fluorescence emitted by
vegetation. In order to properly interpret the measured
fluorescence signal, essential vegetation variables need to
be retrieved concomitantly. FLEX will fly in tandem
formation with Sentinel-3 (S3), which conveys the Ocean and
Land Color Instrument (OLCI) that is designed to
characterize the atmosphere and the terrestrial vegetation
at a spatial resolution of 300 m. In support of FLEX’s
preparatory activities, this paper presents a first
validation exercise of OLCI vegetation products against in
situ data coming from the 2018 FLEXSense campaign. During
this campaign, leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) and leaf area
index (LAI) measurements were collected over croplands,
while HyPlant DUAL images of the area were acquired at a 3 m
spatial resolution. A multiscale validation strategy was
pursued. First, estimates of these two variables, together
with the combined canopy chlorophyll content (CCC = LCC ×
LAI), were obtained at the HyPlant spatial resolution and
were compared against the in situ measurements. Second, the
fine-scale retrieval maps from HyPlant were coarsened to the
S3 spatial scale as a reference to assess the quality of the
OLCI vegetation products. As an intermediary step,
vegetation products extracted from Sentinel-2 data were used
to compare retrievals at the in-between spatial resolution
of 20 m. For all spatial scales, CCC delivered the most
accurate estimates with the smallest prediction error
obtained at the 300 m resolution (R2 of 0.74 and RMSE = 26.8
μg cm−2). Results of a scaling analysis suggest that CCC
performs well at the different tested spatial resolutions
since it presents a linear behavior across scales. LCC, on
the other hand, was poorly retrieved at the 300 m scale,
showing overestimated values over heterogeneous pixels. The
introduction of a new LCC model integrating mixed
reflectance spectra in its training enabled to improve by
$16\%$ the retrieval accuracy for this variable (RMSE = 10
μg cm−2 for the new model versus RMSE = 11.9 μg cm−2
for the former model).},
cin = {IBG-2},
ddc = {620},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
pnm = {217 - Für eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von
Ressourcen zu Produkten (POF4-217)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000644673700001},
doi = {10.3390/rs13081419},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/891684},
}