% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Reiter:891762,
author = {Reiter, Alexander and Herbst, Laura and Wiechert, Wolfgang
and Oldiges, Marco},
title = {{N}eed for speed: evaluation of dilute and shoot-mass
spectrometry for accelerated metabolic phenotyping in
bioprocess development},
journal = {Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry},
volume = {413},
issn = {0016-1152},
address = {Heidelberg},
publisher = {Springer},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-01722},
pages = {3253-3268},
year = {2021},
abstract = {With the utilization of small-scale and highly parallelized
cultivation platforms embedded in laboratory robotics,
microbial phenotyping and bioprocess development have been
substantially accelerated, thus generating a bottleneck in
bioanalytical bioprocess sample analytics. While microscale
cultivation platforms allow the monitoring of typical
process parameters, only limited information about product
and by-product formation is provided without comprehensive
analytics. The use of liquid chromatography mass
spectrometry can provide such a comprehensive and
quantitative insight, but is often limited by analysis
runtime and throughput. In this study, we developed and
evaluated six methods for amino acid quantification based on
two strong cation exchanger columns and a dilute and shoot
approach in hyphenation with either a triple-quadrupole or a
quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Isotope
dilution mass spectrometry with 13C15N labeled amino acids
was used to correct for matrix effects. The versatility of
the methods for metabolite profiling studies of microbial
cultivation supernatants is confirmed by a detailed method
validation study. The methods using chromatography columns
showed a linear range of approx. 4 orders of magnitude,
sufficient response factors, and low quantification limits
(7–443 nM) for single analytes. Overall, relative standard
deviation was comparable for all analytes, with < $8\%$ and
< $11\%$ for unbuffered and buffered media, respectively.
The dilute and shoot methods with an analysis time of 1 min
provided similar performance but showed a factor of up to 35
times higher throughput. The performance and applicability
of the dilute and shoot method are demonstrated using a
library of Corynebacterium glutamicum strains producing
l-histidine, obtained from random mutagenesis, which were
cultivated in a microscale cultivation platform.},
cin = {IBG-1},
ddc = {540},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-1-20101118},
pnm = {2171 - Biological and environmental resources for
sustainable use (POF4-217)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {33791825},
UT = {WOS:000635497000002},
doi = {10.1007/s00216-021-03261-3},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/891762},
}