Home > Publications database > Failure Load and Fatigue Behavior of Monolithic Translucent Zirconia, PICN and Rapid-Layer Posterior Single Crowns on Zirconia Implants > print

001     891794
005     20210623133400.0
024 7 _ |2 doi
|a 10.3390/ma14081990
024 7 _ |2 Handle
|a 2128/27776
024 7 _ |a 33921126
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000644553400001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2021-01741
082 _ _ |a 600
100 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Spitznagel , Frank A.
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Failure Load and Fatigue Behavior of Monolithic Translucent Zirconia, PICN and Rapid-Layer Posterior Single Crowns on Zirconia Implants
260 _ _ |a Basel
|b MDPI
|c 2021
336 7 _ |2 DRIVER
|a article
336 7 _ |2 DataCite
|a Output Types/Journal article
336 7 _ |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|s 1620732043_29692
336 7 _ |2 BibTeX
|a ARTICLE
336 7 _ |2 ORCID
|a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
336 7 _ |0 0
|2 EndNote
|a Journal Article
520 _ _ |a This laboratory study aimed to evaluate the thermo-mechanical fatigue behavior and failure modes of monolithic and rapid-layer posterior single-crowns (SCs) supported by zirconia implants. Methods: 120 all-ceramic crowns supported by one-piece zirconia implants (ceramic.implant; vitaclinical) were divided into five groups (n = 24 each): Group Z-HT: 3Y-TZP monolithic-zirconia (Vita-YZ-HT); Group Z-ST: 4Y-TZP monolithic-zirconia (Vita-YZ-ST); Z-XT: 5Y-TZP monolithic-zirconia (Vita-YZ-XT); Group E: monolithic-polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN,Vita-Enamic); Group RL (rapid layer): PICN-“table-top” (Vita-Enamic), 3Y-TZP-framework (Vita-YZ-HT). Half of the specimens of each group (n = 12) were exposed to fatigue with cyclic mechanical loading (F = 198N, 1.2-million cycles) and simultaneous thermocycling (5–55 °C). Single-load-to-failure testing (Z010, Zwick) was performed for all specimens without/with fatigue application. Data analysis was performed using ANOVA, Tukey’s post-hoc test, two-sample t-test and Bonferroni correction (p < 0.05). Results: All specimens survived fatigue exposure. Significant differences in failure loads were detected among groups (p ≤ 0.004). Materials Z-HT and Z-ST showed the highest failure loads followed by Z-XT, RL and E. The influence of fatigue was only significant for material RL. Conclusions: All types of tested materials exceeded clinically acceptable failure load values higher than 900N and can be recommended for clinical use. Z-HT and Z-ST appear to be highly reliable towards fatigue. Rapid-layer design of PICN and YZ-HT might be an interesting treatment concept for posterior implant SCs.Keywords: dental implant; zirconia; ceramics; translucent zirconia; fatigue; failure load; aging; chewing simulation
536 _ _ |a 525 - Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|c POF4-525
|x 0
|f POF IV
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to DataCite
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Röhrig, Sara
|b 1
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)131693
|a Langner, Robert
|b 2
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Gierthmuehlen, Petra C.
|b 3
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)2487261-1
|a 10.3390/ma14081990
|n 8
|p 1990
|t Materials
|v 14
|x 1996-1944
|y 2021
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/891794/files/Failure%20Load%20and%20Fatigue%20Behavior%20of%20Monolithic%20Translucent.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:891794
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131693
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 2
|k FZJ
913 0 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-571
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Connectivity and Activity
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b SCOPUS
|d 2020-09-04
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2020-09-04
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
|d 2020-09-04
915 _ _ |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
|a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2020-09-04
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|a JCR
|b MATERIALS : 2018
|d 2020-09-04
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2020-09-04
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b DOAJ
|d 2020-09-04
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|a WoS
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2020-09-04
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|a Fees
|d 2020-09-04
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2020-09-04
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|a IF < 5
|d 2020-09-04
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
|a OpenAccess
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|a Peer Review
|b ASC
|d 2020-09-04
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|a Article Processing Charges
|d 2020-09-04
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Medline
|d 2020-09-04
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b PubMed Central
|d 2020-09-04
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2020-09-04
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
|k INM-7
|l Gehirn & Verhalten
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
980 1 _ |a FullTexts

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21