% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Dieken:891977,
      author       = {Dieken, Sophia and Dallendörfer, Mirko and Henseleit,
                      Meike and Siekmann, Florian and Venghaus, Sandra},
      title        = {{T}he multitudes of bioeconomies: {A} systematic review of
                      stakeholders’ bioeconomy perceptions},
      journal      = {Sustainable production and consumption},
      volume       = {27},
      issn         = {2352-5509},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2021-01854},
      pages        = {1703-1717},
      year         = {2021},
      abstract     = {‘Bioeconomy’, the use of sustainably produced biomass
                      and the application of biotechnologies, serves as an
                      umbrella term for highly diverse interests and perspectives
                      by a large number of stakeholders involved and by broader
                      society. Consequently, research on stakeholder perceptions
                      of the bioeconomy has increased, investigating questions of,
                      e.g., underlying normative assumptions, political legitimacy
                      and participation, or consumer acceptance. In order to
                      identify the current state of research and avenues for
                      further research, we conduct a systematic literature review
                      of stakeholders’ bioeconomy perceptions. To this aim, we
                      developed a mixed-methods approach based on the inductive
                      coding of research articles. The review finds an overall
                      dominance of biotechnology and resource themes, and a strong
                      focus on research, policy and industry stakeholders. A lack
                      of ecological and societal concerns, against the background
                      of few research works on actors from civil society, suggests
                      a gap between the bioeconomy as a sustainability concept and
                      the perceptions of stakeholders involved. Overall, stronger
                      consideration of societal stakeholders is required both in
                      research and policy.},
      cin          = {IEK-STE},
      ddc          = {333.7},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
      pnm          = {1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways
                      (POF4-111) / 153 - Assessment of Energy Systems –
                      Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security
                      (POF3-153) / 1111 - Effective System Transformation Pathways
                      (POF4-111)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112 / G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153 /
                      G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1111},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000674221300002},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.006},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/891977},
}