% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Meishner:891988,
      author       = {Meishner, Fabian and Sauer, Dirk Uwe},
      title        = {{T}echnical and economic comparison of different electric
                      bus concepts based on actual demonstrations in {E}uropean
                      cities},
      journal      = {IET electrical systems in transportation},
      volume       = {10},
      number       = {2},
      issn         = {2042-9746},
      address      = {London},
      publisher    = {IET},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2021-01860},
      pages        = {144 - 153},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {Battery‐powered electric buses are increasingly being
                      used around the globe. This work investigates four
                      technological concepts for the rollout of electric buses
                      from a technical and economic perspective: very fast and
                      moderate opportunity charging, overnight charging and
                      trolley hybrid buses (power supply via catenary/battery).
                      The investigations fund on real demonstrations in four
                      European cities. They were carried out in direct cooperation
                      with the respective public transport operators to obtain
                      realistic results. The focus of this work is on an economic
                      comparison based on the total cost of ownership (TCO),
                      including all investment and operating costs in the bus
                      service. Thereby, the battery represents a major asset and
                      is examined more closely, especially with regard to the
                      expected service life. The TCO of corresponding electric and
                      diesel buses, scaled up to a complete line, are directly
                      compared. This includes penalty costs for the emissions of
                      noise and pollutants. Sensitivity analyses on the most
                      relevant variables are conducted to take into account risks
                      and uncertainties. It shows that electric buses can nowadays
                      already be economically competitive under favourable
                      assumptions, regardless of the concept. Trolley hybrid buses
                      turned out to be the most cost‐effective variant in their
                      respective country.},
      cin          = {IEK-12},
      ddc          = {380},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-12-20141217},
      pnm          = {131 - Electrochemical Storage (POF3-131)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-131},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000535922200003},
      doi          = {10.1049/iet-est.2019.0014},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/891988},
}