% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Myznikov:891996,
      author       = {Myznikov, A. and Zheltyakova, M. and Korotkov, A. and
                      Kireev, M. and Masharipov, R. and Jagmurov, O. Dz. and
                      Habel, U. and Votinov, M.},
      title        = {{N}euroanatomical {C}orrelates of {S}ocial {I}ntelligence
                      {M}easured by the {G}uilford {T}est},
      journal      = {Brain topography},
      volume       = {34},
      number       = {3},
      issn         = {1573-6792},
      address      = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2021-01868},
      pages        = {337 - 347},
      year         = {2021},
      abstract     = {Social interactions are a crucial aspect of human
                      behaviour. Numerous neurophysiological studies have focused
                      on socio-cognitive processes associated with the so-called
                      theory of mind—the ability to attribute mental states to
                      oneself and others. Theory of mind is closely related to
                      social intelligence defined as a set of abilities that
                      facilitate effective social interactions. Social
                      intelligence encompasses multiple theory of mind components
                      and can be measured by the Four Factor Test of Social
                      Intelligence (the Guilford-Sullivan test). However, it is
                      unclear whether the differences in social intelligence are
                      reflected in structural brain differences. During the
                      experiment, 48 healthy right-handed individuals completed
                      the Guilford-Sullivan test. T1-weighted structural MRI
                      images were obtained for all participants. Voxel-based
                      morphometry analysis was performed to reveal grey matter
                      volume differences between the two groups (24 subjects in
                      each)—with high social intelligence scores and with low
                      social intelligence scores, respectively. Participants with
                      high social intelligence scores had larger grey matter
                      volumes of the bilateral caudate. The obtained results
                      suggest the caudate nucleus involvement in the neural system
                      of socio-cognitive processes, reflected by its structural
                      characteristics.},
      cin          = {INM-10},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113},
      pnm          = {5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {33866460},
      UT           = {WOS:000640947100001},
      doi          = {10.1007/s10548-021-00837-1},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/891996},
}