% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Heinrichs:892831,
author = {Heinrichs, Bert},
title = {{M}oral ambivalence. {A} comment on non-invasive prenatal
testing from an ethical perspective},
journal = {Journal of perinatal medicine},
volume = {49},
number = {8},
issn = {0300-5577},
address = {Berlin [u.a.]},
publisher = {de Gruyter},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-02371},
pages = {949–952},
year = {2021},
abstract = {BackgroundNon-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been
available for almost 10 years. In many countries the test
attracted considerable criticism from the start. While most
critical comments in this context deal with the (alleged)
problem of eugenic selection, I will concentrate on a
somewhat broader issue.ContentI will argue that NIPT clearly
has the potential to increase reproductive autonomy and
benefit expectant parents. However, NIPT can also put people
in a situation that is morally overwhelming for them and
from which there is no easy way out. In this sense, such
tests can have a dilemma-generating effect.Summary and
OutlookI will conclude that this can be adequately described
by the term “moral ambivalence”.},
cin = {INM-8},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-8-20090406},
pnm = {5255 - Neuroethics and Ethics of Information (POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:34022124},
UT = {WOS:000708079600004},
doi = {10.1515/jpm-2021-0194},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/892831},
}