000893097 001__ 893097
000893097 005__ 20240711101431.0
000893097 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/28041
000893097 0247_ $$2URN$$aurn:nbn:de:0001-2021072212
000893097 020__ $$a978-3-95806-545-1
000893097 037__ $$aFZJ-2021-02556
000893097 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)168162$$aWang, Yuan$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000893097 245__ $$aTechno-economic Assessment of Hybrid Post-combustion Carbon Capture Systems in Coal-fired Power Plants and Steel Plants$$f- 2020-09-09
000893097 260__ $$aJülich$$bForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Znetralbibliothek, Verlag$$c2021
000893097 300__ $$aIV, xx, 230
000893097 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Dissertation
000893097 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)3$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aBook$$mbook
000893097 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aDISSERTATION
000893097 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aPHDTHESIS
000893097 3367_ $$02$$2EndNote$$aThesis
000893097 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)11$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aDissertation / PhD Thesis$$bphd$$mphd$$s1625729888_31892
000893097 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$adoctoralThesis
000893097 4900_ $$aSchriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich Reihe Energie & Umwelt / Energy & Environment$$v534
000893097 502__ $$aDissertation, RWTH Aachen University, 2020$$bDissertation$$cRWTH Aachen University$$d2020
000893097 520__ $$aPost-combustion carbon capture technology is seen as an indispensable option for global CO2mitigation. Nevertheless, the benchmark post-combustion carbon capture technology, i.e. theMEA-based chemical absorption technology, has been reported to be rather energy-intensive.Meanwhile, the performance of the gas permeation membrane technology, one of the emergingalternative carbon capture technologies, has also been found to be restricted by the membraneproperties, especially when it is designed to be applied in industrial-scale plants. As a result, theapplications of the post-combustion carbon capture technology in the power and industrialsectors are faced with great resistance. On the other hand, the research of post-combustioncarbon capture for industry is found to lag behind the power sector. The objective of this work isto advance the feasibility of post-combustion carbon capture technology as well as contribute tothe study of carbon capture in the steelmaking industry.In order to do this, two types of hybrid membrane/MEA carbon capture systems (Hybrid D1 &D2) were designed in Aspen Plus®. In the Hybrid D1 system, a single-stage membrane iscombined with an MEA system while a cascaded membrane system and an MEA system arecombined in the Hybrid D2 system. For comparison, two widely studied standalone capturesystems (cascaded membrane & MEA) were also modeled. The Polyactive® membrane wasselected to be the investigated membrane material. These carbon capture systems weredeployed in a reference coal-fired power plant and a reference iron & steel plant, respectively. Amodel of the power plant was simulated using EBSILON® Professional to represent the detailedoperation. Pinch analysis was used to analyze the potential for waste heat integration of thecapture systems into the water-steam cycle. In addition, the performances of the capturesystems when the power plant is operated at part-load were investigated. As for the iron & steelplant, the energy use network and point sources of CO2 emissions inside the plant wereanalyzed so as to specify the boundary condition for carbon capture. A cost model based on thediscounted cash flow approach was developed for economic analysis.In the power plant, it is revealed that the Hybrid D1 system is neither an energy-efficient nor acost-effective design. The Hybrid D2 system, however, has shown to lead to both a lowerefficiency penalty (9.7 %-pts) and a lower CO2 avoidance cost (48.8 €/tCO2) than the standalonecascaded membrane and MEA systems in the power plant. A basic principle for the design of ahybrid system is concluded according to the result.In the iron & steel plant, the Hybrid D2 system leads to the lowest CO2 avoidance cost (53.9€/tCO2) but the differences in the avoidance costs of different capture systems are insignificantconsidering the uncertainty of the cost model. It is also found that the steam supply strategy haspronounced impacts on the cost competitiveness of a carbon capture system. In addition, it isdisclosed that an overall lower CO2 avoidance cost can be achieved by deploying multiple typesof capture systems to deal with different point sources of CO2 emissions as compared todeploying only one single type of capture system.
000893097 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1111$$a1111 - Effective System Transformation Pathways (POF4-111)$$cPOF4-111$$fPOF IV$$x0
000893097 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112$$a1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways (POF4-111)$$cPOF4-111$$fPOF IV$$x1
000893097 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/893097/files/Energie_Umwelt_534.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000893097 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:893097$$pdnbdelivery$$pVDB$$pdriver$$purn$$popen_access$$popenaire
000893097 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000893097 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000893097 9141_ $$y2021
000893097 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)168162$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000893097 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)36225-6$$6P:(DE-Juel1)168162$$aRWTH Aachen$$b0$$kRWTH
000893097 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-111$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-110$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1111$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Energie$$lEnergiesystemdesign (ESD)$$vEnergiesystemtransformation$$x0
000893097 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-111$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-110$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Energie$$lEnergiesystemdesign (ESD)$$vEnergiesystemtransformation$$x1
000893097 920__ $$lyes
000893097 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013$$kIEK-3$$lTechnoökonomische Systemanalyse$$x0
000893097 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000893097 980__ $$aphd
000893097 980__ $$aVDB
000893097 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000893097 980__ $$abook
000893097 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013
000893097 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-2-20101013