% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Jockwitz:893285,
      author       = {Jockwitz, C. and Wiersch, L. and Stumme, J. and Caspers,
                      S.},
      title        = {{C}ognitive profiles in older males and females},
      journal      = {Scientific reports},
      volume       = {11},
      number       = {1},
      issn         = {2045-2322},
      address      = {[London]},
      publisher    = {Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2021-02675},
      pages        = {6524},
      year         = {2021},
      abstract     = {Males and females are subject to differences in cognitive
                      processing strategies, i.e. the way males and females solve
                      cognitive tasks. So far primarily reported for younger
                      adults, this seems to be especially important in older
                      adults, who also show sex differences in cognitive
                      impairments. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to
                      examine the older adult population with respect to cognitive
                      profiles derived from a large variety of cognitive
                      functions. Using an exploratory component analysis with
                      consecutive confirmatory factor analysis in a sample of 676
                      older adults, neuropsychological performance data in a
                      variety of cognitive domains was decomposed into cognitive
                      components. A general cognitive profile based on the whole
                      group fits unequally well on the two sexes. Importantly,
                      cognitive profiles based on either males or females differ
                      in terms of their composition of cognitive components, i.e.
                      three components in males versus four components in females,
                      with a generally better model fit in females. Thus, related
                      to the established differences in processing styles between
                      males and females the current study found a rather
                      decomposed (or local) cognitive profile in females while
                      males seem to show a holistic (or global) cognitive profile,
                      with more interrelations between different cognitive
                      functions.},
      cin          = {INM-1},
      ddc          = {600},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-1-20090406},
      pnm          = {525 - Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
                      (POF4-525) / HBP SGA3 - Human Brain Project Specific Grant
                      Agreement 3 (945539)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525 / G:(EU-Grant)945539},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {33753754},
      UT           = {WOS:000634963000043},
      doi          = {10.1038/s41598-021-84134-8},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/893285},
}