% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Heinrichs:893353,
author = {Heinrichs, Jan-Hendrik},
title = {{T}he case for biotechnological exceptionalism},
journal = {Medicine, health care and philosophy},
volume = {24},
number = {0},
issn = {1572-8633},
address = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
publisher = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-02705},
pages = {659–666},
year = {2021},
abstract = {Do biomedical interventions raise special moral concerns? A
rising number of prominent authors claim that at least in
the case of biomedical enhancement they do not. Treating
biomedical enhancements different from non-biomedical ones,
they claim, amounts to unjustified biomedical
exceptionalism. This article vindicates the familiar thesis
that biomedical enhancement raises specific concerns. Taking
a close look at the argumentative strategy against
biomedical exceptionalism and provides counterexamples
showing that the biomedical mode of interventions raises
concerns not relevant otherwise. In particular, biomedical
interventions throughout raise concerns of informed consent,
which only rarely turn up in comparable non-biomedical
interventions.},
cin = {INM-8},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-8-20090406},
pnm = {5255 - Neuroethics and Ethics of Information (POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {34146227},
UT = {WOS:000663501900002},
doi = {10.1007/s11019-021-10032-5},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/893353},
}