% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Wang:893891,
author = {Wang, Fangzhou and Bürgler, Daniel E. and Adam, Roman and
Parlak, Umut and Cao, Derang and Greb, Christian and
Heidtfeld, Sarah and Schneider, Claus M.},
title = {{M}agnetization relaxation dynamics in [ {C}o / {P}t ] 3
multilayers on pico- and nanosecond timescales},
journal = {Physical review research},
volume = {3},
number = {3},
issn = {2643-1564},
address = {College Park, MD},
publisher = {APS},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-02903},
pages = {033061},
year = {2021},
abstract = {We experimentally investigated magnetization relaxation
dynamics in the largely unexplored time window extending
from few picoseconds up to two nanoseconds following
femtosecond laser pulse excitation. We triggered
magnetization dynamics in [Co(0.4nm)/Pt(0.7nm)]3 multilayers
and measured the resulting magneto-optic response by
recording both transient hysteresis loops as well as
transients of magnetization dynamics. We observe that the
coercive field of the sample is still strongly suppressed
even ∼1 ms after the laser excitation, which is three
orders of magnitude longer than the recovery time of the
magnetization amplitude. In addition, we succeeded to fit
the magnetization relaxation data in the entire
experimentally observed time window by considering two
phenomenological time constants τ∗f and τ∗s describing
fast (ps) and slow (ns) magnetization relaxation processes,
respectively. The fits of the data suggest a magnetic field
dependent relaxation slowdown beyond 100 ps after
excitation. We observe an explosion of the τ∗f and τ∗s
values when the magnetization is completely quenched and
relaxes intrinsically in the absence of an external magnetic
field. We interpret the phenomenological time constants
τ∗f and τ∗s using an intuitive physical picture based
on the Landau-Lifshitz-Bloch model and numerical solutions
of the extended three-temperature model [Shim et al., Sci.
Rep. 10, 6355 (2020)].},
cin = {PGI-6},
ddc = {530},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)PGI-6-20110106},
pnm = {5214 - Quantum State Preparation and Control (POF4-521)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5214},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000674633500008},
doi = {10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.033061},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/893891},
}