% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Jonen:893928,
author = {Jonen, M. and Heim, Stefan and Grünert, M. and Neuloh, G.
and Sakreida, K.},
title = {{A}daption of a semantic picture-word interference paradigm
for future language mapping with transcranial magnetic
stimulation: {A} behavioural study},
journal = {Behavioural brain research},
volume = {412},
issn = {0166-4328},
address = {Amsterdam},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-02938},
pages = {113418},
year = {2021},
abstract = {Neuro-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
helps to identify language-related cortical regions prior to
brain tumour surgery. We adapted a semantic picture-word
interference (PWI) paradigm from psycholinguistics to
high-resolution TMS language mapping which prospectively can
be used to specifically address the level of semantic
processing. In PWI, pictures are presented along with
distractor words which facilitate or inhibit the lexical
access to the picture name. These modulatory effects of
distractors can be annihilated in language-sensitive areas
by the inhibitory effects of TMS on language processing. The
rationale here is to observe the distractor effect without
active stimulation and then to observe presumably its
elimination by interference of the TMS stimulation. The
special requirements to use PWI in this setting are (1)
identifying word material for accelerating reliably naming
latencies, choosing (2) the ideal presentation modality, and
(3) the appropriate timing of distractor presentation. These
are then controlled in real TMS language mapping. To adapt a
semantic PWI naming paradigm for TMS application we employed
30 object-pictures in spoken German language. Part-whole
associative semantic related or unrelated distractors were
presented in two experiments including 15 healthy volunteers
each, once auditorily and once visually. Data analysis
across the entire stimulus set revealed a trend for
facilitation in the visual condition, whereas no effects
were observed for auditory distractors. In a sub-set, we
found a significant facilitation effect for visual semantic
distractors. Thus, with this study we provide a
well-controlled item set for future studies implementing
effective TMS language mapping applying visual semantic
PWI.},
cin = {INM-1},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-1-20090406},
pnm = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
(POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {34153427},
UT = {WOS:000674656800008},
doi = {10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113418},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/893928},
}