% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Friedrich:893933,
author = {Friedrich, Patrick and Forkel, Stephanie J. and Amiez,
Céline and Balsters, Joshua H. and Coulon, Olivier and Fan,
Lingzhong and Goulas, Alexandros and Hadj-Bouziane, Fadila
and Hecht, Erin E. and Heuer, Katja and Jiang, Tianzi and
Latzman, Robert D. and Liu, Xiaojin and Loh, Kep Kee and
Patil, Kaustubh R. and Lopez-Persem, Alizée and Procyk,
Emmanuel and Sallet, Jerome and Toro, Roberto and Vickery,
Sam and Weis, Susanne and Wilson, Charles R. E. and Xu, Ting
and Zerbi, Valerio and Eickhoff, Simon and Margulies, Daniel
S. and Mars, Rogier B. and Thiebaut de Schotten, Michel},
title = {{I}maging evolution of the primate brain: the next
frontier?},
journal = {NeuroImage},
volume = {228},
issn = {1053-8119},
address = {Orlando, Fla.},
publisher = {Academic Press},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-02943},
pages = {117685 -},
year = {2021},
note = {Thisworkwasinspiredbythe#CompMRImeetinginDusseldorf,Germany(April11–122019),whichwassupportedbytheHumanBrainProject.TheworkofRBMissupportedbytheBiotechnologyandBio-logicalSciencesResearchCouncil(BBSRC)UK[BB/N019814/1]andtheNetherlandsOrganizationforScientificResearchNWO[452-13-015].J.S.wassupportedbyaSirHenryDaleWellcomeTrustFel-lowship(105651/Z/14/Z)andIDEXLYON“IMPULSION2020grant(IDEX/IMP/2020/14).TheWellcomeCentreforIntegrativeNeu-roimagingissupportedbycorefundingfromtheWellcomeTrust[203139/Z/16/Z].MTShasreceivedfundingfromtheEuropeanRe-searchCouncil(ERC)undertheEuropeanUnion’sHorizon2020re-searchandinnovationprogramme(grantagreementNo.818521).EEHwassupportedbyNationalScienceFoundationawardsIOS-1457291andNCS-1631563},
abstract = {Evolution, as we currently understand it, strikes a
delicate balance between animals’ ancestral history and
adaptations to their current niche. Similarities between
species are generally considered inherited from a common
ancestor whereas observed differences are considered as more
recent evolution. Hence comparing species can provide
insights into the evolutionary history. Comparative
neuroimaging has recently emerged as a novel subdiscipline,
which uses magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify
similarities and differences in brain structure and function
across species. Whereas invasive histological and molecular
techniques are superior in spatial resolution, they are
laborious, post-mortem, and oftentimes limited to specific
species. Neuroimaging, by comparison, has the advantages of
being applicable across species and allows for fast,
whole-brain, repeatable, and multi-modal measurements of the
structure and function in living brains and post-mortem
tissue. In this review, we summarise the current state of
the art in comparative anatomy and function of the brain and
gather together the main scientific questions to be explored
in the future of the fascinating new field of brain
evolution derived from comparative neuroimaging.},
cin = {INM-7},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
pnm = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
(POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {33359344},
UT = {WOS:000617722700012},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117685},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/893933},
}