001     894205
005     20240313103125.0
024 7 _ |a 2128/28440
|2 Handle
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2021-03096
041 _ _ |a English
100 1 _ |a Stella, Alessandra
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)171932
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
111 2 _ |a Computational Neuroscience Conference
|g CNS2021
|c Online
|d 2021-07-03 - 2021-07-07
|w USA
245 _ _ |a Behaviorally Relevant Spatio-Temporal Spike Patterns in Parallel Spike Trains
260 _ _ |c 2021
336 7 _ |a Conference Paper
|0 33
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a INPROCEEDINGS
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a conferenceObject
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a CONFERENCE_POSTER
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Conference Poster
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Poster
|b poster
|m poster
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)24
|s 1628577282_15849
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|x After Call
520 _ _ |a The Hebbian hypothesis [1] states that neurons organize in assemblies of co-active neuronsacting as information processing units. We hypothesize that assembly activity is expressedby the occurrence of precise spatio-temporal patterns (STPs) of spikes - with precisetemporal delays between the spikes - emitted by neurons that presumably are members ofan assembly.We developed a method, called SPADE [2,3,4], that detects significant STPs in massivelyparallel spike trains. SPADE involves three steps: it first identifies repeatingSTPs using Frequent Itemset Mining [5]; second, it evaluates the detected patterns forsignificance through surrogates (trial-shifting); third, it removes the false positive patternsthat are a by-product of true patterns and the background activity.Here, we aim to evaluate if cell assemblies are active in relation to motor behavior [2].Therefore, we analyzed N=20 experimental sessions consisting of about 100 parallel spiketrains recorded by a 100-electrode Utah array in the pre-/motor cortex of two macaquemonkeys performing a reach-to-grasp task [6,7]. In this task, the monkey, after an instructedpreparatory period, had to pull and hold an object by using either a side or a precision grip,and using either high or low force (four behavioral conditions). We segmented trials into 500ms periods and concatenated them to analyze separately for the occurrence of STPs. Eachsignificant STP is identified by its neuron composition, its number and times of occurrencesand the delays between spikes of the pattern. The temporal resolution of the detectedpatterns is fixed to 5ms.We find that STPs occur in all phases of the behavior. In particular, we find about 6 patternsper session, where only 3 to 13 individual neurons are involved in STPs. Pattern can repeatfrom 280 to 10 times, depending on the size, which varies from 2 to 6 neurons. Within asession, patterns strongly depend on the behavioral context, and we do not find identicalpatterns in the different epochs. Thus, patterns are specific to a behavioral condition,suggesting that different assemblies are activated for each specific behavioral context.Patterns that occur in a single session typically overlap in the participating neurons, and afew individual neurons appear as hubs, i.e. are involved in several patterns. We also findthat pattern neurons are not located within a small region, but distributed across the entirecortical surface covered by the Utah array.Our results are consistent with the model of the synfire chain (SFC) [8]. A theoretical studyshowed [9] that patterns emerging from SFC activity can be found in parallel spike train datarecorded with a 100-electrode Utah array, i.e. despite the strong subsampling.References[1] Hebb, D. O. (1949). John Wiley & Sons.[2] Torre et al (2016) J Neurosci. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4375-15.2016.[3] Quaglio et al. (2017). Front Comp Neurosci,. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2017.00041.[4] Stella et al. (2019). Biosystems. DOI:10.1016/j.biosystems.2019.104022.[5] Pormann et al. (2021). Submitted.[6] Brochier et al. (2018). Scientific data. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2018.55.[7] Riehle et al. (2013). Front. Neural Circuits. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2013.00048.[8] Abeles (1991) Cambridge University Press.[9] Berling, David (2020). Master thesis in physics, RWTH Aachen Univ., Germany.
536 _ _ |a 571 - Connectivity and Activity (POF3-571)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-571
|c POF3-571
|f POF III
|x 0
536 _ _ |a 5231 - Neuroscientific Foundations (POF4-523)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5231
|c POF4-523
|f POF IV
|x 1
536 _ _ |a HAF - Helmholtz Analytics Framework (ZT-I-0003)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)ZT-I-0003
|c ZT-I-0003
|x 2
536 _ _ |a HBP SGA2 - Human Brain Project Specific Grant Agreement 2 (785907)
|0 G:(EU-Grant)785907
|c 785907
|f H2020-SGA-FETFLAG-HBP-2017
|x 3
536 _ _ |a HBP SGA3 - Human Brain Project Specific Grant Agreement 3 (945539)
|0 G:(EU-Grant)945539
|c 945539
|x 4
700 1 _ |a Bouss, Peter
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)178725
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Palm, Günther
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)172768
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Grün, Sonja
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)144168
|b 3
|u fzj
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/894205/files/poster_stella_CNS2021.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:894205
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p ec_fundedresources
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)171932
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)178725
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)172768
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)144168
913 0 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-571
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Connectivity and Activity
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-523
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Neuromorphic Computing and Network Dynamics
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5231
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-6-20090406
|k INM-6
|l Computational and Systems Neuroscience
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828
|k IAS-6
|l Theoretical Neuroscience
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113
|k INM-10
|l Jara-Institut Brain structure-function relationships
|x 2
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a poster
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-6-20090406
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21