000894711 001__ 894711
000894711 005__ 20210930133536.0
000894711 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1590/s1678-3921.pab2021.v56.01455
000894711 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0100-204X
000894711 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1678-3921
000894711 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/28646
000894711 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000691766300001
000894711 037__ $$aFZJ-2021-03363
000894711 041__ $$aEnglish
000894711 082__ $$a640
000894711 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPereira, Lucas Felisberto$$b0
000894711 245__ $$aPhysiological changes in soybean cultivated with soil remineralizer in the Cerrado under variable water regimes
000894711 260__ $$aBrasília$$c2021
000894711 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000894711 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000894711 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1631630674_26978
000894711 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000894711 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000894711 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000894711 520__ $$aThe objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of the soil remineralizer fine-graded mica schist (FMS) on soybean (Glycine max) physiology, yield, and grain quality under different water regimes (WRs) in the Brazilian Cerrado. The experiment was conducted under field conditions for two years, using four WRs and three treatments: mica schist, conventional fertilization, and control. In 2017 and 2018, the following WRs were evaluated: WR1, WR2, WR3, and WR4, corresponding to a mean value of 100, 65, 44, and 28% of crop evapotranspiration replacement, respectively. Photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, transpiration, internal CO2 concentration, effective quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII) (Fv’/Fm’), quantum yield (PSII) (ᶲFSII), and electron transport rate reduced as a function of the advanced phenological stage of soybean and the reduction in WR. Grain quality was only affected by the WR. The mica schist was statistically similar to conventional fertilization and the control in 2017 and 2018. Yield decreased due to the anticipation of soybean phenological age and WR, but there were no differences between the three treatments in 2017 and 2018. The reduction in soybean yield is attributed to stomatal closure, loss of photoprotective capacity, and damage to the photosynthetic machinery caused by drought.
000894711 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173$$a2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact (POF4-217)$$cPOF4-217$$fPOF IV$$x0
000894711 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
000894711 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRibeiro Junior, Walter Quadros$$b1$$eCorresponding author
000894711 7001_ $$00000-0002-4516-7352$$aRamos, Maria Lucrécia Gerosa$$b2
000894711 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)173970$$aSantos, Nicolas Zendonadi dos$$b3
000894711 7001_ $$00000-0002-0803-1632$$aSoares, Guilherme Filgueiras$$b4
000894711 7001_ $$00000-0002-5996-4432$$aCasari, Raphael Augusto das Chagas Noqueli$$b5
000894711 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)161185$$aMuller, Onno$$b6
000894711 7001_ $$00000-0003-2813-8442$$aTavares, Cássio Jardim$$b7
000894711 7001_ $$00000-0003-2881-683X$$aMartins, Éder de Souza$$b8
000894711 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129388$$aRascher, Uwe$$b9
000894711 7001_ $$00000-0002-6405-0344$$aGuimarães, Cristiane Andréa de Lima$$b10
000894711 7001_ $$00000-0002-5572-4466$$aPereira, André Ferreira$$b11
000894711 7001_ $$00000-0001-7622-0649$$aMertz-Henning, Liliane Márcia$$b12
000894711 7001_ $$00000-0003-3497-0761$$aSousa, Carlos Antonio Ferreira de$$b13
000894711 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2053197-7$$a10.1590/s1678-3921.pab2021.v56.01455$$gVol. 56, p. e01455$$pe01455$$tPesquisa agropecuária brasileira$$v56$$x1678-3921$$y2021
000894711 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/894711/files/Pesquisa.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000894711 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:894711$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000894711 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)173970$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000894711 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)161185$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b6$$kFZJ
000894711 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129388$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b9$$kFZJ
000894711 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt$$lErde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten$$vFür eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten$$x0
000894711 9141_ $$y2021
000894711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2021-02-02
000894711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2021-02-02
000894711 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000894711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1040$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bZoological Record$$d2021-02-02
000894711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bPESQUI AGROPECU BRAS : 2019$$d2021-02-02
000894711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2021-02-02
000894711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2021-02-02
000894711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2021-02-02
000894711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2021-02-02
000894711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2021-02-02
000894711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000894711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Peer review$$d2021-02-02
000894711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences$$d2021-02-02
000894711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2021-02-02
000894711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2021-02-02
000894711 920__ $$lyes
000894711 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118$$kIBG-2$$lPflanzenwissenschaften$$x0
000894711 980__ $$ajournal
000894711 980__ $$aVDB
000894711 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000894711 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000894711 9801_ $$aFullTexts