% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Levitis:894838,
author = {Levitis, Elizabeth and van Praag, Cassandra D Gould and
Gau, Rémi and Heunis, Stephan and DuPre, Elizabeth and
Kiar, Gregory and Bottenhorn, Katherine L and Glatard,
Tristan and Nikolaidis, Aki and Whitaker, Kirstie Jane and
Mancini, Matteo and Niso, Guiomar and Afyouni, Soroosh and
Alonso-Ortiz, Eva and Appelhoff, Stefan and Arnatkeviciute,
Aurina and Atay, Selim Melvin and Auer, Tibor and
Baracchini, Giulia and Bayer, Johanna M M and Beauvais,
Michael J S and Bijsterbosch, Janine D and Bilgin, Isil P
and Bollmann, Saskia and Bollmann, Steffen and
Botvinik-Nezer, Rotem and Bright, Molly G and Calhoun, Vince
D and Chen, Xiao and Chopra, Sidhant and Chuan-Peng, Hu and
Close, Thomas G and Cookson, Savannah L and Craddock, R
Cameron and De La Vega, Alejandro and De Leener, Benjamin
and Demeter, Damion V and Di Maio, Paola and Dickie, Erin W
and Eickhoff, Simon B and Esteban, Oscar and Finc, Karolina
and Frigo, Matteo and Ganesan, Saampras and Ganz, Melanie
and Garner, Kelly G and Garza-Villarreal, Eduardo A and
Gonzalez-Escamilla, Gabriel and Goswami, Rohit and
Griffiths, John D and Grootswagers, Tijl and Guay, Samuel
and Guest, Olivia and Handwerker, Daniel A and Herholz, Peer
and Heuer, Katja and Huijser, Dorien C and Iacovella,
Vittorio and Joseph, Michael J E and Karakuzu, Agah and
Keator, David B and Kobeleva, Xenia and Kumar, Manoj and
Laird, Angela R and Larson-Prior, Linda J and Lautarescu,
Alexandra and Lazari, Alberto and Legarreta, Jon Haitz and
Li, Xue-Ying and Lv, Jinglei and Mansour L., Sina and
Meunier, David and Moraczewski, Dustin and Nandi, Tulika and
Nastase, Samuel A and Nau, Matthias and Noble, Stephanie and
Norgaard, Martin and Obungoloch, Johnes and Oostenveld,
Robert and Orchard, Edwina R and Pinho, Ana Luísa and
Poldrack, Russell A and Qiu, Anqi and Raamana, Pradeep Reddy
and Rokem, Ariel and Rutherford, Saige and Sharan, Malvika
and Shaw, Thomas B and Syeda, Warda T and Testerman, Meghan
M and Toro, Roberto and Valk, Sofie L and Van Den Bossche,
Sofie and Varoquaux, Gaël and Váša, František and
Veldsman, Michele and Vohryzek, Jakub and Wagner, Adina S
and Walsh, Reubs J and White, Tonya and Wong, Fu-Te and Xie,
Xihe and Yan, Chao-Gan and Yang, Yu-Fang and Yee, Yohan and
Zanitti, Gaston E and Van Gulick, Ana E and Duff, Eugene and
Maumet, Camille},
title = {{C}entering inclusivity in the design of online
conferences—{A}n {OHBM}–{O}pen {S}cience perspective},
journal = {GigaScience},
volume = {10},
number = {8},
issn = {2047-217X},
address = {Oxford},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-03422},
pages = {giab051},
year = {2021},
abstract = {As the global health crisis unfolded, many academic
conferences moved online in 2020. This move has been hailed
as a positive step towards inclusivity in its attenuation of
economic, physical, and legal barriers and effectively
enabled many individuals from groups that have traditionally
been underrepresented to join and participate. A number of
studies have outlined how moving online made it possible to
gather a more global community and has increased
opportunities for individuals with various constraints,
e.g., caregiving responsibilities. Yet, the mere existence
of online conferences is no guarantee that everyone can
attend and participate meaningfully. In fact, many elements
of an online conference are still significant barriers to
truly diverse participation: the tools used can be
inaccessible for some individuals; the scheduling choices
can favour some geographical locations; the set-up of the
conference can provide more visibility to well-established
researchers and reduce opportunities for early-career
researchers. While acknowledging the benefits of an online
setting, especially for individuals who have traditionally
been underrepresented or excluded, we recognize that
fostering social justice requires inclusivity to actively be
centered in every aspect of online conference design. Here,
we draw from the literature and from our own experiences to
identify practices that purposefully encourage a diverse
community to attend, participate in, and lead online
conferences. Reflecting on how to design more inclusive
online events is especially important as multiple scientific
organizations have announced that they will continue
offering an online version of their event when in-person
conferences can resume.},
cin = {INM-7},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
pnm = {5255 - Neuroethics and Ethics of Information (POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:34414422},
UT = {WOS:000692548400003},
doi = {10.1093/gigascience/giab051},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/894838},
}