000894885 001__ 894885
000894885 005__ 20211130111103.0
000894885 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.21203/rs.3.rs-318945/v1
000894885 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1186/s13705-021-00298-1
000894885 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/29049
000894885 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:114112401
000894885 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000672446800001
000894885 037__ $$aFZJ-2021-03451
000894885 082__ $$a333.7
000894885 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPrehofer, Sigrid$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000894885 245__ $$aLinking qualitative scenarios with quantitative energy models. Knowledge integration in different methodological designs.
000894885 260__ $$aHeidelberg$$bSpringer$$c2021
000894885 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000894885 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000894885 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1637222819_30969
000894885 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000894885 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000894885 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000894885 520__ $$aBackground Linking qualitative scenarios with quantitative models is a common approach to integrate assumptions on possible future societal contexts into modeling. But reflection on how and to what degree knowledge is effectively integrated during this endeavor does not generally take place. In this paper, we reflect on the performance of a specific hybrid scenario approach (qualitative Cross-Impact Balance analysis linked with quantitative energy models) concerning knowledge integration through eleven different process steps. In order to guide the scenario community in applying this approach, we reflect on general methodological features as well as different design options. We conceptualize different forms of interdisciplinary knowledge integration ( compiling , combining and synthesizing ) and analyze how and to what degree knowledge about society and uncertainty are integrated into scenario process and products. In addition, we discuss trade-offs regarding design choices and forms of knowledge integration. Results On the basis of three case studies we identify two general designs of linking which build on each other (basic and extended design) and which differ in essence regarding the balance of power between the CIB and the energy modeling. Ex-post assessment of the form of interdisciplinary knowledge integration in each step revealed that specific method properties of CIB as well as the interaction with additional quantitative as well as specific qualitative methods foster distinct forms of knowledge integration. The specific roles assigned to CIB in the hybrid scenario process can also influence the form of knowledge integration. Conclusions In this study, we use a joint process scheme linking qualitative context scenarios with energy modeling. By applying our conceptualization of different forms of knowledge integration we analyze the designs´ respective potential for and respective effects on knowledge integration. Consequently, our findings can give guidance to those who are designing their own hybrid scenario processes. As this is an explorative study, many roads for further empirical research are indicated. Finally, we note that at some points in the process a more precise differentiation of knowledge integration forms would have been useful and propose to further differentiate and detail the three forms of interdisciplinary knowledge integration in future research.
000894885 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112$$a1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways (POF4-111)$$cPOF4-111$$fPOF IV$$x0
000894885 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000894885 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKosow, Hannah$$b1
000894885 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aNaegler, Tobias$$b2
000894885 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPregger, Thomas$$b3
000894885 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)130491$$aVögele, Stefan$$b4
000894885 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWeimer-Jehle, Wolfgang$$b5
000894885 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2641015-1$$a10.1186/s13705-021-00298-1$$gVol. 11, no. 1, p. 25$$p25$$tEnergy, Sustainability and Society$$v11$$x2192-0567$$y2021
000894885 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/894885/files/s13705-021-00298-1.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000894885 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:894885$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000894885 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)130491$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
000894885 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-111$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-110$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Energie$$lEnergiesystemdesign (ESD)$$vEnergiesystemtransformation$$x0
000894885 9141_ $$y2021
000894885 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2021-02-02
000894885 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2021-02-02
000894885 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000894885 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bENERGY SUSTAIN SOC : 2019$$d2021-02-02
000894885 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2021-02-02
000894885 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2021-02-02
000894885 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2021-02-02
000894885 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2021-02-02
000894885 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2021-02-02
000894885 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2021-02-02
000894885 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000894885 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Blind peer review$$d2021-02-02
000894885 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2021-02-02
000894885 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2021-02-02
000894885 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2021-02-02
000894885 920__ $$lyes
000894885 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013$$kIEK-STE$$lSystemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung$$x0
000894885 980__ $$ajournal
000894885 980__ $$aVDB
000894885 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000894885 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
000894885 9801_ $$aFullTexts