000894920 001__ 894920
000894920 005__ 20211130111059.0
000894920 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.08.010
000894920 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0149-7634
000894920 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1873-7528
000894920 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/28639
000894920 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:111848336
000894920 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:34400176
000894920 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000709411900001
000894920 037__ $$aFZJ-2021-03482
000894920 082__ $$a610
000894920 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHill-Bowen, Lauren D.$$b0
000894920 245__ $$aThe cue-reactivity paradigm: An ensemble of networks driving attention and cognition when viewing drug and natural reward-related stimuli
000894920 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2021
000894920 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000894920 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000894920 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1631618519_26978
000894920 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000894920 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000894920 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000894920 520__ $$aThe cue-reactivity paradigm is a widely adopted neuroimaging probe engendering brain activity linked with attentional, affective, and reward processes following presentation of appetitive stimuli. Given the multiple mental operations invoked, we sought to decompose cue-related brain activity into constituent components employing emergent meta-analytic techniques when considering drug and natural reward-related cues. We conducted coordinate-based meta-analyses delineating common and distinct brain activity convergence across cue-reactivity studies (N = 196 articles) involving drug (n = 133) or natural (n = 63) visual stimuli. Across all studies, convergence was observed in limbic, cingulate, insula, and fronto-parieto-occipital regions. Drug-distinct convergence was observed in posterior cingulate, dorsolateral prefrontal, and temporo-parietal regions, whereas distinct-natural convergence was observed in thalamic, insular, orbitofrontal, and occipital regions. We characterized connectivity profiles of identified regions by leveraging task-independent and task-dependent MRI datasets, grouped these profiles into subnetworks, and linked each with putative mental operations. Outcomes suggest multifaceted brain activity during cue-reactivity can be decomposed into elemental processes and indicate that while drugs of abuse usurp the brain's natural-reward-processing system, some regions appear distinct to drug cue-reactivity.
000894920 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252$$a5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x0
000894920 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
000894920 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRiedel, Michael C.$$b1
000894920 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPoudel, Ranjita$$b2
000894920 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSalo, Taylor$$b3
000894920 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aFlannery, Jessica S.$$b4
000894920 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)172024$$aCamilleri, Julia A.$$b5
000894920 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131678$$aEickhoff, Simon B.$$b6
000894920 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLaird, Angela R.$$b7
000894920 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSutherland, Matthew T.$$b8$$eCorresponding author
000894920 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1498433-7$$a10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.08.010$$gVol. 130, p. 201 - 213$$p201 - 213$$tNeuroscience & biobehavioral reviews$$v130$$x0149-7634$$y2021
000894920 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/894920/files/2020.02.26.966549v2.full.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000894920 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:894920$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000894920 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)172024$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b5$$kFZJ
000894920 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131678$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b6$$kFZJ
000894920 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x0
000894920 9141_ $$y2021
000894920 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2021-01-31
000894920 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2021-01-31
000894920 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2021-01-31
000894920 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2021-01-31
000894920 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
000894920 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bNEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R : 2019$$d2021-01-31
000894920 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences$$d2021-01-31
000894920 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2021-01-31
000894920 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2021-01-31
000894920 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000894920 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2021-01-31
000894920 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9905$$2StatID$$aIF >= 5$$bNEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R : 2019$$d2021-01-31
000894920 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1120$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Reviews Reports And Meetings$$d2021-01-31
000894920 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2021-01-31
000894920 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2021-01-31$$wger
000894920 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2021-01-31
000894920 920__ $$lyes
000894920 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406$$kINM-7$$lGehirn & Verhalten$$x0
000894920 980__ $$ajournal
000894920 980__ $$aVDB
000894920 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000894920 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
000894920 9801_ $$aFullTexts