% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{HillBowen:894920,
      author       = {Hill-Bowen, Lauren D. and Riedel, Michael C. and Poudel,
                      Ranjita and Salo, Taylor and Flannery, Jessica S. and
                      Camilleri, Julia A. and Eickhoff, Simon B. and Laird, Angela
                      R. and Sutherland, Matthew T.},
      title        = {{T}he cue-reactivity paradigm: {A}n ensemble of networks
                      driving attention and cognition when viewing drug and
                      natural reward-related stimuli},
      journal      = {Neuroscience $\&$ biobehavioral reviews},
      volume       = {130},
      issn         = {0149-7634},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2021-03482},
      pages        = {201 - 213},
      year         = {2021},
      abstract     = {The cue-reactivity paradigm is a widely adopted
                      neuroimaging probe engendering brain activity linked with
                      attentional, affective, and reward processes following
                      presentation of appetitive stimuli. Given the multiple
                      mental operations invoked, we sought to decompose
                      cue-related brain activity into constituent components
                      employing emergent meta-analytic techniques when considering
                      drug and natural reward-related cues. We conducted
                      coordinate-based meta-analyses delineating common and
                      distinct brain activity convergence across cue-reactivity
                      studies (N = 196 articles) involving drug (n = 133) or
                      natural (n = 63) visual stimuli. Across all studies,
                      convergence was observed in limbic, cingulate, insula, and
                      fronto-parieto-occipital regions. Drug-distinct convergence
                      was observed in posterior cingulate, dorsolateral
                      prefrontal, and temporo-parietal regions, whereas
                      distinct-natural convergence was observed in thalamic,
                      insular, orbitofrontal, and occipital regions. We
                      characterized connectivity profiles of identified regions by
                      leveraging task-independent and task-dependent MRI datasets,
                      grouped these profiles into subnetworks, and linked each
                      with putative mental operations. Outcomes suggest
                      multifaceted brain activity during cue-reactivity can be
                      decomposed into elemental processes and indicate that while
                      drugs of abuse usurp the brain's natural-reward-processing
                      system, some regions appear distinct to drug
                      cue-reactivity.},
      cin          = {INM-7},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
      pnm          = {5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:34400176},
      UT           = {WOS:000709411900001},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.08.010},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/894920},
}