000895031 001__ 895031
000895031 005__ 20211130111056.0
000895031 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.08.001
000895031 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0197-4580
000895031 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1558-1497
000895031 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/28663
000895031 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:111697758
000895031 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:34487950
000895031 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000709436000004
000895031 037__ $$aFZJ-2021-03539
000895031 082__ $$a610
000895031 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)176642$$aOverhoff, Helen$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000895031 245__ $$aNeural correlates of metacognition across the adult lifespan
000895031 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2021
000895031 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000895031 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000895031 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1632123143_23426
000895031 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000895031 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000895031 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000895031 520__ $$aMetacognitive accuracy describes the degree of overlap between the subjective perception of one's decision accuracy (i.e. confidence) and objectively observed performance. With older age, the need for accurate metacognitive evaluation increases; however, error detection rates typically decrease. We investigated the effect of ageing on metacognitive accuracy using event-related potentials (ERPs) reflecting error detection and confidence: the error/correct negativity (Ne/c) and the error/correct positivity (Pe/c). Sixty-five healthy adults (20 to 76 years) completed a complex Flanker task and provided confidence ratings. We found that metacognitive accuracy declined with age beyond the expected decline in task performance, while the adaptive adjustment of behaviour was well preserved. Pe amplitudes following errors varied by confidence rating, but they did not mirror the reduction in metacognitive accuracy. Ne amplitudes decreased with age for low confidence errors. The results suggest that age-related difficulties in metacognitive evaluation could be related to an impaired integration of decision accuracy and confidence information processing. Ultimately, training the metacognitive evaluation of fundamental decisions in older adults might constitute a promising endeavour.
000895031 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251$$a5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x0
000895031 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
000895031 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)186650$$aKo, Yiu Hong$$b1
000895031 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aFeuerriegel, Daniel$$b2
000895031 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131720$$aFink, Gereon Rudolf$$b3
000895031 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aStahl, Jutta$$b4
000895031 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131748$$aWeiss, Peter H.$$b5
000895031 7001_ $$00000-0002-0258-7795$$aBode, Stefan$$b6
000895031 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)156353$$aNiessen, Eva$$b7
000895031 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1498414-3$$a10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.08.001$$gVol. 108, p. 34 - 46$$p34 - 46$$tNeurobiology of aging$$v108$$x0197-4580$$y2021
000895031 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/895031/files/Overhoff_2021_Neurobiol%20Aging_%20Neural%20correlates%20of%20metacognition...-1.pdf
000895031 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/895031/files/Overhoff_2021_Neurobiol%20Aging_Neural%20correlates%20of%20metacognition....pdf$$yPublished on 2021-08-08. Available in OpenAccess from 2022-08-08.
000895031 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:895031$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000895031 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)176642$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000895031 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)186650$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000895031 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131720$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000895031 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131748$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b5$$kFZJ
000895031 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)156353$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b7$$kFZJ
000895031 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x0
000895031 9141_ $$y2021
000895031 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2021-01-28
000895031 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2021-01-28
000895031 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2021-01-28
000895031 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2021-01-28
000895031 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2021-01-28
000895031 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
000895031 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0530$$2StatID$$aEmbargoed OpenAccess
000895031 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bNEUROBIOL AGING : 2019$$d2021-01-28
000895031 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences$$d2021-01-28
000895031 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2021-01-28
000895031 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2021-01-28
000895031 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2021-01-28
000895031 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2021-01-28
000895031 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2021-01-28
000895031 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2021-01-28$$wger
000895031 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2021-01-28
000895031 920__ $$lyes
000895031 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406$$kINM-3$$lKognitive Neurowissenschaften$$x0
000895031 980__ $$ajournal
000895031 980__ $$aVDB
000895031 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000895031 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
000895031 9801_ $$aFullTexts